Not quite sure what you mean; let's just say that living systems don't require any extraordinary efforts to conserve energy and mass, because that's what they do naturally, i.e., "be conserved". There is no known way to violate conservation of energy or mass.
Mass and energy
Energy is always conserved. You can neither create nor destroy energy. The same goes for mass. They can only be moved from one frame of reference to another. Fission has nothing to do with it. Ditto for fusion.One area of "confusion" for many people is Einstein's mass-energy equivalence equation e = mc2. Some people think it means that mass can be converted to energy and vice versa. Nope. Not even close. Mass is energy, and energy is mass. Think about that.
It doesn't. In General Relativity, energy (and therefore mass) is NOT conserved - and the Universe on a large scale is described, to a great extent, by General Relativity. The reason energy is not conserved is simply that the conditions for Nöther's Theorem are not fulfilled, due to the expansion of the Universe.Note that under ordinary, everyday circumstances, the conditions for Nöther's Theorem ARE fulfilled, and energy (and therefore mass) IS conserved.
Total amount of energy and mass in process must be conserved it may change to another type of energy but can not just disappear.
It is often stated that mass is transformed to energy. This is wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved in a chemical reaction - or in a nuclear reaction. The Wikipedia article on "binding energy" clarifies this.
Acceleration is not conserved. Energy can not be created nor destroyed. Mass and momentum are both conserved through a set time.
A tiny bit of the mass of each fissioned (or fused) atom is converted to energy. Energy is not conserver... Mass-Energy is conserved.
Mass (Matter) and Energy is conserved during a Chemical equation
EXACTLY that same as non-living systems.
In the beginning of the 20th century. He proposed mass-energy equivalence in 1905, and set out to mathematically express this. E = mc2 shows that energy can be converted into mass, and mass into energy. Thus, we no longer say that mass is conserved, or energy is conserved. But rather, we say that mass-energy is conserved.
Yes. Basically, energy is ALWAYS conserved. The popular saying, that in a nuclear reaction mass is converted to energy, is plainly wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved. Read about "mass deficit", for example in the Wikipedia, for more details.
Energy is ALWAYS conserved. The appropriate sum of mass and energy is always conserved. If an atom emits a photon, the atom has less energy/mass, and the universe minus that atom has more energy/mass. It's like carrying some energy from here to there.
While overall ENERGY has to be conserved, MASS does not. In a nuclear reaction mass can be converted into energy so the mass of the products may be less than the mass of the reactants. The difference in mass is converted into energy as Einstein's equation describes (E=MC squared). In a chemical reaction MASS has to be conserved.
Mass and energy
Energy isn't conserved in a process where there's a trade between mass and energy according to E = m c2 . When both mass and energy are tallied, the total is conserved.
Because energy can be converted into mass and vice versa. Thus, while the mass of a system is not conserved in a particular process, the mass and energy of a closed system is always conserved.
No - However, energy and mass are conserved. This is dictated by Einstein's most famous equation: ∆E=∆mc2