i really dont know lol
About 250,000 men served as regulars or as militiamen for the Revolutionary cause in the eight years of the war, but there were never more than 90,000 men under arms at one time.
They fought differently than the British. When the British used military tactics, such as firing lines. The Patriots used Gorilla style tactics. This included hiding and waiting for British troops to pass by. Also the Patriots went after the British Officers, not just the troops. The British mostly just went for the Patriots troops.
The British fought against the colonists during the revolutionary war. but the British were more likely to win because they were far more wealthy than the colonists were, and the British also had more people in their armies. But the colonists were fighting on familiar land and had they had the courage to fight because they were defending their land, their homes and their country, and they also didn't need to send troops across the Atlantic ocean to fight.
tsvfvhyz
The "Patriots" were the American colonists fighting for independence from Britain. They were patriotic in that they supported their fellow colonists, the people who lived there, rather than the colonial power of the British Empire. After more than a century and a half of building farms and cities in the wilderness, many colonists considered themselves the rightful heirs to the future of the region.
More than 27,200 hope that helped a good site is Theamericanrevolution.org
nja si det
We now have bigger and better weapons We now have bigger and better weapons
About 250,000 men served as regulars or as militiamen for the Revolutionary cause in the eight years of the war, but there were never more than 90,000 men under arms at one time.
because they fought with himantes not gloves
They fought differently than the British. When the British used military tactics, such as firing lines. The Patriots used Gorilla style tactics. This included hiding and waiting for British troops to pass by. Also the Patriots went after the British Officers, not just the troops. The British mostly just went for the Patriots troops.
New weapons had been developed and the armies were still using some old ways to fight.
Differently THAN is correct. My question was: is it "differently than" or "differently from" but I can't find any examples of "differently from" in all of Google, so I have to assume "differently than" is the correct choice. 'Different FROM' is correct, from this. 'differently from' arises. Searching Google [I notice your correct but unusual capitalisation of the proper noun ' Google'] implies you are interested in the wisdom of crowds rather than grammatical correctness.
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals 1948 = MCMXLVIII But the ancient Romans would have wrote it out differently than how we do it today
well he got chosen to be a patriot in the war by other patriots cause he was brave and all so i guess he is a patriot.
The British fought against the colonists during the revolutionary war. but the British were more likely to win because they were far more wealthy than the colonists were, and the British also had more people in their armies. But the colonists were fighting on familiar land and had they had the courage to fight because they were defending their land, their homes and their country, and they also didn't need to send troops across the Atlantic ocean to fight.
"I can only say truly, that Dabney fought with great bravery and lost all his limbs." This quote refers to the bravery and sacrifice of Austin Dabney, an African American man who fought in the American Revolutionary War.