they are both plants
native plants had most requirements of fertilizers and pesticides.
yes
It depends if they're native or non-native. Usually non-native plants are pests because they take over everything.
Non-native plants are commonly found in urban areas and along roadsides in the US. These plants are often introduced through landscaping or accidental spread and can outcompete native species, leading to ecosystem imbalances.
TRUE
Plants are living things and all life on earth is organic, therefore there are no non-organic plants. Unless you are talking nuclear power plants or somthing similar.
Plants are living things and all life on earth is organic, therefore there are no non-organic plants. Unless you are talking nuclear power plants or somthing similar.
A non-native plant in an ecosystem can outcompete native plant species for resources like sunlight, water, and nutrients, leading to a decrease in biodiversity. This can disrupt the balance of the ecosystem and impact wildlife that rely on native plants for food and shelter. Additionally, non-native plants may not have natural predators in the new environment, allowing them to spread rapidly and become invasive.
Non-native plants can negatively impact local ecosystems by outcompeting native species, reducing biodiversity, altering soil composition, and disrupting food chains. They may also introduce diseases or pests that can harm native plants and wildlife. It is important to prioritize native plant species in landscaping to support the health and balance of the local environment.
Pollen grains from plants which do not flower are very similar to that of flowering plants, except they are different.
I don't know. I've been trying to figure it out forever.
plants from shakespear's plays