In a completely absolute monarchy, the King or Queen makes up the rules, and his or her subjects must abide by them.
The king or queen.
Absolute monarchy.
The mian kinds are Absolute monarchy and Constitutional Monarchy. With an absolute monarchy, there is one spreme ruler who controls all of the land and the people with no higer form of government above with. With a constitutional monarchy, There is a ruler who is the leader of a government but does not have supreme power. (does not control everything but is still a part of the government)
1. In an absolute monarchy only the people selected by the ruler are allowed to participate in the government. 2. In an absolute monarchy one person, the ruler, has the power to make decisions. 3. Majority rules does not exist in an absolute monarchy. Minority rule and one-person rule exist in an absolute monarchy. (I COPIED THIS FROM MY TEXTBOOK)
Absolute monarchy
Absolute monarchy. A dictatorship implies a republican form of government where the leader rules as a "first citizen", whereas in a monarchy, the ruler is a sovereign who embodies the state. Pharaohs fit the latter.
Absolute Monarchy or Absolutism
In a constitutional monarchy, like in England, the monarch does not have much power at all, because there is a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, they have absolute power. In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by some set of rules or document (e.g. a constitution), which sets out the powers given to the monarch. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a legislature. How much power is given to each group and the monarch varies widely, and is entirely up to the constitution of the country in question. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is presumed to be God-(or other deity)-ordained, and rules with no limits on their power.
Absolute Monarchy
Absolute monarchy is when a country is ruled by one person. There are pros and cons when is comes toabsolute monarchy. I think that absolute monarchy was positive for Europe during the 17thand 18thcentury.I think that absolute monarchy was positive because it was easy to understand. It was easy to understandbecause it was ruled only by one person. Creating laws were quicker and simpler. It was also a lot stricterwith absolute monarchy with more rules.
Theoretically, it is a form of monarchy where a sovereign rules with no checks and balances. Practically, they tended to be limited by the aristocracy and/or by religious leaders and doctrines. Thus, most were absolute in name only.
The main difference between absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is that in an absolute monarchy, the monarch has absolute control and power, whereas, in a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by the constitution. Monarchy is a form of governance in which a single person acts as the head of state.