In a constitutional monarchy, like in England, the monarch does not have much power at all, because there is a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, they have absolute power.
In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by some set of rules or document (e.g. a constitution), which sets out the powers given to the monarch. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a legislature. How much power is given to each group and the monarch varies widely, and is entirely up to the constitution of the country in question.
In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is presumed to be God-(or other deity)-ordained, and rules with no limits on their power.
The main difference between absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is that in an absolute monarchy, the monarch has absolute control and power, whereas, in a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by the constitution. Monarchy is a form of governance in which a single person acts as the head of state.
The difference between absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is that in the absolute monarchy, the monarch holds the supreme or absolute powers, whereas in the constitutional monarchy, the head of state is a hereditary or elected monarch
The similarities between a monarchy and constitutional monarchy are that their are both monarchies.
It is between constitutional monarchy and absolute monarchy
an oligarchy is ruled by an elite group; an absolute monarchy is ruled by a single individual.
nothing its all the same
A absolute monarchy means the monarch acts as the sole power of authority for the state. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch acts as head of state, but is bound by a set of rules or constitution which limit their power in some way. Constitutional monarchies often have a parlimentary system, and sometimes (but not always) the monarch plays largely a ceremonial role. Constitutional monarchies have also co-existed in facist states.
If the monarchy is not a constitutional monarchy, then essentially they are all dictatorships.
An absolute monarchy is ruled by a single individual; a republic elects representatives to make decisions.
In a constitutional monarchy, the king or queen is the head of state, but they are checked by the provisions of the constitution. The monarch in a ceremonial position is merely a figurehead.
Both monarchy and constitutional monarchy are systems of governance where a monarch serves as the head of state. In a traditional monarchy, the monarch holds absolute power and their authority is often derived from divine right or hereditary succession. In contrast, a constitutional monarchy limits the monarch's powers through a constitution or legal framework, allowing for a democratic system where political decisions are made by elected representatives. While both systems maintain a royal figure, the key difference lies in the distribution of power and the role of the monarchy in governance.
Parliamentary monarchy is a monarchy where the leader is only used as a figurehead. (only there for show, for looks, etc. while the parliament deals with all the work. Absolute monarch is where the leader is in complete control of EVERYTHING. He isn't just there for looks, he's there because he has all power and makes all decisions. The second paragraph is correct (about the Absolute Monarchy), but the first is not quite right - a parliamentary monarchy (usually referred to as a constitutional monarchy) does NOT have to have an impotent monarch. In a parliamentary monarchy, the monarch remains the Head of State, and may also retain a variable amount of Executive Branch power. Certain parliamentary monarchs have virtually no real Executive power, while others have a significant amount, including cases where the monarch is dominant over Parliament. For example, compare the governments of Great Britain, Jordan, and Monaco. All are nominally constitutional (parliamentary) monarchies, but the amount of power retained by the monarch varies widely.