The difference between absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is that in the absolute monarchy, the monarch holds the supreme or absolute powers, whereas in the constitutional monarchy, the head of state is a hereditary or elected monarch
i don't know the way that they are alike, but the absolute the ruler can legally do whatever he/she wants, but as the constitutional, the ruler is bound by the constitution and it's laws.
The similarities between a monarchy and constitutional monarchy are that their are both monarchies.
After centuries of absolutism e.g., England and France became parliamentary (or constitutional ) monarchies.
We raided their ships
There are three monarchies (constitutional monarchies) in Southeast Asia : Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Cambodia (Kampuchea) and Malaysia have monarchs elected from the royal families, while Thailand has a single heriditary ruling family.
Most countries moved from absolute monarchies to constitutional monarchies --> NovaNET They began to change when the church came to power and the crusades began. At that point, western Rome was back in the loop. Also, knights were becoming unnecessary due to the invention of the English longbow.
national monarchy (medieval times, rising of western leadership) absolute monarchy (think Louis XIV, Frederick the Great, etc etc) constitutional monarchy (Modern monarchies)
Their are several types of monarchies, but the most famous are Constitutional, Hereditary, and Absolute
All the absolute monarchies in Europe have dissolved into some form of a democracy. Most of them transformed into Constitutional Monarchies, in which there is still a monarch that rules but they are accompanied by a parliament. There is one country in Europe that can still be considered a monarchy: the Vatican. The Pope is the ruler and thus labels the Vatican as an absolute monarchy, although the "monarch" is elected.
There are three African countries that are run by monarchies and earn the title 'Kingdom'. They are Lesotho, Morocco and Swaziland. Lesotho and Morocco have constitutional monarchies, meaning that the monarch is also the head of state by the laws of the constitution. The United Kingdom, Spain, Denmark and Sweden are examples of constitutional monarchies. Swaziland, however, has an absolute monarchy, so that the monarch shares the titles of head of state and head of government, not restricted by a constitution or law. Along with Brunei, Qatar, Oman and Saudi Arabia, Swaziland is the only current absolute monarchy, and is the only non-Islamic absolute monarchy. Previous African monarchies included Zululand in South Africa, Ashanti in Ghana and varying sub-national monarchies in present-day Uganda.
In a monarchy, the extent and protection of human rights can vary significantly depending on whether it is an absolute or constitutional monarchy. In absolute monarchies, human rights may be limited, with the monarch holding significant power over the people's freedoms. Conversely, in constitutional monarchies, human rights are often protected by a constitution or legal framework, allowing for greater civil liberties and political participation. Nonetheless, even in constitutional monarchies, the practical implementation of human rights can be influenced by cultural, political, and historical factors.
The statement is false.