0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it true thatLearning about the natural world starts with memorizing scientific laws and theories?
It doesn't have to.
What is the difference between laws and theories?
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.
Is it true that Learning about the natural world starts with memorizing scientific laws and theories?
No! I would think that is the single worst way to start learning about the natural world. The way to start is to foster curiosity. Memorizing laws and theories kills curiosity faster than heat kills Frosty. Being curious about something, then observing patterns in it, and then seeing that patterns can be formulated into ideas-- now that's not so bad.
What is the comparison between scientific law and scientific theory?
A Scientific Law is a discriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under specified circumstances. A Scientific Theory is a well substantiated explaination of some aspect of the natural world that incoporates facts, laws, and tested hypotheses. Scientific laws are descriptive. They do not seek to explain phenomena, whereas scientific theories do.
A story invented to explain a natural occurrence?
That is the definition of a myth.
Is it true or false that learning the natural world starts with memorizing scientific laws and theories?
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
Is it true thatLearning about the natural world starts with memorizing scientific laws and theories?
It doesn't have to.
Are scientific laws and scientific theories the same?
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
Theories and scientific laws can be changed if?
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
How the prevailing theories about testing bring changes in atomic theories?
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
How are scientific theories scientific law similar?
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
How are scientific theories and scientific laws useful to scientist?
Scientists make use of theories in order to gain further scientific knowledge
Why don't theories become law?
Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.
Do Scientific theories and scientific laws both describe observed events?
Yes.
How do scientific theries differ from scientific laws?
Theories are observations held to be true based on their application to observation and proven scientific laws.
How are scientific theories and scientific laws similar?
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
How are scientific law and scientific theory are the same?
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both based on observations and experimental results.
