They were both concerned with the freeing of slaves.
The first was not a law. It appeared to be a human rights appeal, but was in fact a tactical signal to European countries that they could not send aid to the Confederates without looking pro-slavery themselves.
The second was a formal amendment to the Constitution, and marked the actual end of slavery.
The January 1863 Emancipation Proclamation by President Lincoln did not violate the Constitution; however, it did not have any Constitutional basis, which generated criticism from both Southerners and (some) Northerners alike. That this criticism was a new adversity to be dealt with by Lincoln and his supporters is undeniable: it did not, however, deter the North from its march toward victory in any ultimately significant way.
Ratify is what is necessary to change or make a new amendment to the constitution. If 2/3rds of the states vote to accept the amendment, the amendment passes and is changed or added to the constitutional amendments.
The Senate committees decide which bills, of any kind (statute and Constitutional Amendment alike) go to the Senate floor.
Not alike
they are alike
no they are not alike
They are NOT alike.
they are alike
Because the Southern ports had been blockaded, so they could not export their one big commodity - cotton. Also, nearly all the battles were in the South, so those areas were ravaged by combat and troop-movement. After Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, Union troops were licensed to free any slaves they came across, so depleting the Southern labour-force. Then in the last year, Grant authorised actual burning of farms and wrecking of railroads, which ruined the Southern economy and reduced civilians and troops alike to near-starvation.
magens are alike becuse they can both stick and hold
they are alike by the regions
The population of Alike is 5,766.