0
Both reasons and evidence support an argument by providing justification and proof for a claim. Reasons offer logical explanations or justifications for why a particular claim is true, while evidence includes facts, data, or examples that back up those reasons and strengthen the argument. In essence, reasons and evidence work together to make a persuasive case for a particular position or perspective.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a stance or argument followed by supporting evidence?
An argument is a claim or viewpoint that is supported by evidence or reasons. Supporting evidence can include facts, statistics, examples, expert opinions, or logical reasoning that back up the argument being made. It is important to use strong and relevant evidence to persuade others and strengthen the validity of the argument.
A supporting component of an argument which outlines the reasons for accepting the conclusion is known as the?
Premises. These are statements or propositions that provide evidence or support for a conclusion in an argument.
How do you identify a argument?
An argument is typically identified by the presence of a claim or assertion supported by reasons or evidence. It usually aims to persuade or convince others of a particular viewpoint or conclusion. Look for key elements such as a main assertion, supporting evidence, and acknowledgment of counterarguments.
What is a strong argument?
A strong argument is one that is supported by evidence, examples, logic, and reasoning. It presents a clear and well-structured position that is persuasive to the audience. Additionally, a strong argument anticipates and addresses counterarguments effectively.
What is meant by argument in a persuasion?
An argument in persuasion is a set of reasons or evidence used to convince someone of a particular point of view or to take a specific action. It typically includes a claim or thesis supported by evidence and reasoning to make a persuasive case. The goal of the argument is to sway the audience's opinion or behavior through logical reasoning and emotional appeals.
What should a philosophical argument involve?
A philosophical argument should involve presenting a clear thesis or claim, providing reasons or evidence to support the claim, addressing potential objections or counterarguments, and drawing logical conclusions based on the premises presented. It should also aim to be coherent, well-structured, and engage with relevant philosophical concepts or theories.
What are the essential components of a logical argument?
1. Facts 2. reasons 3. evidence
What are the five principle steps to analyzing an argument?
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process: 1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact. 2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence. 3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
What is the definition of the word argue?
argue is a verb meaning: 1. Present reasons and arguments 2. Have an argument about something 3. Give evidence of
Why is it important to examine evidence of an argument?
Examining evidence helps to ensure that the argument is well-supported and credible. It allows for a deeper understanding of the topic by providing factual support for claims made. By evaluating the evidence, one can determine the validity and strength of the argument being presented.
Which element is needed for a sound argument?
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Which does a speaker use to make a sound argument?
Evidence to support the argument.
Which does a speaker use to create a sound argument?
evidence to support the argument
What is an argument from silence?
An argument from silence is an argument based on the absence of something being mentioned in documents as evidence.
Can you substitute an analogy for other kinds of evidence to support points of an argument?
An analogy can be persuasive, or it can help people to understand your argument, but it isnt EVIDENCE.
What is an argument from design?
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
What does an argument have to have in order to have warrant?
Supporting evidence
