0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What happened after the trial?
It depends on crime and the verdict reached.
What word means a decision reached at the end of a trial?
Verdict.
What ruling in an case appeal means the decision was unfairly reached and a new trial is ordered?
vacated and remanded for a new trial
Why was Tucker brought to trial?
Tucker was brought to trial because he was accused of committing a crime and there was enough evidence to warrant a trial to determine his guilt or innocence. The trial is a legal process where evidence is presented and a verdict is reached by a judge or jury.
A trial that is terminated before a verdict is reached?
It can be accomplished in three manners: The defendant pleads guilty - the judge declares a mis-trial - or the judge dismisses the charges.
When did scopes monkey trial end?
The 8 day Scopes Trial ended when the jury reached a verdict on July 21, 1925. John Scopes was found guilty and charged a fine.
Which trial reached the magnitude and importance as the Lindbergh trial?
Magnitude and importance are two different things. I'll go with magnitude since I don't know how to judge importance of a trial. Lizzie Bordon, Scopes "Monkey" Trial, Nuremberg Tribunal, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, O.J. Simpson...
Is a decision reached at the end of a trial?
first the judge will tell your charge the verdict will decide and finally is the conviction
What are the similarities between a decision reached in a binding mediation and a civil trial decision?
They both are enforceable and have the effect of law.
What is the difference between a mistrial and a request for a new trial?
A mistrial occurs when a trial is terminated before a verdict is reached due to procedural errors or misconduct. A request for a new trial is made after a verdict is reached but is based on legal errors or misconduct that occurred during the trial process.
Who stated that slaves were not citizens and the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional?
Chief Justice, Roger Taney, in the Dred Scott trial, when it reached the Supreme Court in 1857.
Why does the principle of double jeopardy not apply if a trail jury cannot reach a verdict in a case?
The trial can be repeated without it being considered double jeopardy when a verdict was not reached unless it was dismissed with prejudiced. They reason is that you are not considered to have been tried if a verdict was not able to be reached. Sometimes a case can be dismissed with prejudice and another trial is not allowed. This can happen if they determine that they was not enough evidence to even go to the jury
