No, contracts cannot override the Constitution. You cannot contract to do something illegal. Any agreement that violates the Constitution would be considered illegal.
NO, any such contract would be considered VOID and unenforcable. Just meaningless paper, not a violation of the law.
And remember, the Constitution applies to, and limits ONLY governments, not private parties. Could your corporate employer offer you a contract that limits your freedom of speech? Certainly, almost all employers do so. No government could have such a contract or policy.
no state law overrides federal law. this is so, according to the supremacy clause found in article VI, paragraph 2 of the federal constitution.
The Constitution is considered to be the Supreme Law of the land. This is because the US Constitution overrules all other laws at all levels throughout the country.
The ability to enforce laws that contradict any federal law, treaty, or the constitution. If state law says 'A' and Congress passes a law that says 'B', or the US enters a treaty that says B, then the federal law overrides the state law.
It becomes law.
It becomes law.
NO, it is preemtion
Article 3 section 10 of the Philippine Constitution says that the government cannot pass a law that will effect a citizen's obligation on a contract. A contract must be followed with no way to get out of it.
Article 3 section 10 of the Philippine Constitution says that the government cannot pass a law that will effect a citizen's obligation on a contract. A contract must be followed with no way to get out of it.
Article 3 section 10 of the Philippine Constitution says that the government cannot pass a law that will effect a citizen's obligation on a contract. A contract must be followed with no way to get out of it.
Then whatever the Bill is, goes into the law.
-Rule of Law -Basic Rights -Government by agreement or contract
Since the Constitution places the power and responsibility for passage of legislation with the Congress, passing a law is more an example of the basic function of the legislative branch than an example of checks and balances. However, it could become an example of checks and balances if Congress passes a law, the President vetoes it, and Congress then overrides the President's veto as provided in the Constitution.