0
How can a person be charged with tampering with physical evidence because a vehicle accident?
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is an example sentence for tampering?
The case was adjourned because someone had been tampering with the evidence.
What does the word evidence mean?
Evidence refers to matters which tend to prove an alleged fact. It is often put forward to establish a fact in an inquiry into the past, whether historical, academic or forensic. Evidence generally falls into three categories: eyewitness testimony, documentary evidence, and physical evidence. Eyewitness testimony is someone's account of what they have seen or heard. Documentary evidence consists of letters, official records, and the like. Physical evidence is the kind of evidence found by Sherlock Holmes or CSI: objects which are associated with the inquiry.Evidence can be considered weak or strong generally on two bases: reliability and probative value. Reliability means the likelihood that the evidence itself has been faked or is otherwise inaccurate, while probative value means how strong the connection between the evidence and the fact it is meant to prove. Eyewitness evidence generally has good probative value (depending on what exactly is being said) but dubious reliability. Physical evidence is very reliable, but its probative value is often questionable.So, in an inquiry into a workplace accident, a statement by one worker that he saw the injured worker acting contrary to the safety rules is eyewitness testimony, the record of when the worker signed in for his shift is documentary, and the machine which malfunctioned is physical evidence.Often people mistake argument for evidence. "He couldn't have caused the accident because he has been an employee for 10 years and never had an accident before" is an argument, not evidence.
What is the difference between testimonial and physical evidence?
Evidence in criminal law is any item or testimony that assists in the proof of a prosecution or defense. It can be a weapon, a document, forensic samples or the testimony of a witness, and both sides of a criminal case are allowed to present evidence to the court for consideration. Real evidence is physical evidence, such as a gun, a fingerprint, a photograph, or DNA machine, different from testimonial evidence because it not physical object only is the testimony of a witness.
Why is evidence important?
Because it is now accepted as scientific fact that virtually everyone in the world has different fingerprints. This makes it statistically unlikely that anyone but you could have been at the scene of the crime.
Who died in csi ny?
In season 2 Detective Aiden Burn was killed by a serial killer called DJ Pratt. She was fired at the end of season 1 because of tampering with evidence. Detective Jessica Angel (Flacks girlfriend) was shot.
Are fingerprints considered direct evidence?
Yes, fingerprints are considered direct evidence because they are physical evidence that directly links a person to a crime scene. They provide a unique and identifiable connection between an individual and the location or object in question.
What changes gives NO evidence that a chemical reaction has taken place?
Physical changes give no evidence that a chemical reaction has taken place, because no chemical reaction has taken place.
Why we need site investigation?
We need site investigations because they can recreate the crime or accident, gather information and evidence, which in-turn gives them a clearer picture of what took place.
Can someone who miscarried as the result of physical abuse sue her partner?
Yes, I think she can sue if she has evidence that it was because of the abuse that she suffered a miscarriage.
If bleach gets into urine will it mess up the results?
Yes, it will contaminate the sample causing them to mark it as Unusable. But doing so can be seen as tampering your urinalysis and get you in big trouble. If its just a home test it wont help you much.
What is an organism that evolutionists believe existed but for which they have found no physical evidence?
Because of the way evolution works, evolutionary biologists can propose hypothetical organisms that we may not have found fossil evidence for. However, it is important to realize that scientists are well aware that these organisms may not actually exist, which is why they exist only as ideas or hypotheses until we find evidence for their existence. We know it's ok to propose "hypothetical organisms" because we have found many in the past, and are always finding more. Here is a list of many that we have physical evidence for. Notice that we have physical evidence for transitions between fish to four-legged creatures, reptile-like creatures to mammals, and dinosaurs to birds. Evolutionary theory is amazing, not only because we can make predictions with it, but we consistently find these predictions to be accurate!
How do you know the earth goes around the sun?
Because all the existing physical and astronomical evidence points that way, and there are no sensible theories that indicate otherwise.
