reconciliation of Creation with Evolution is the view of Old-Earth Creationism, which holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs.
In repudiation of Evolution, however, Young-Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution.
See also:
Creationism asserts a religious explanation for the origin of life, providing a sense of purpose and meaning for believers. However, it lacks scientific evidence and contradicts established scientific theories. Evolutionism is supported by scientific evidence and explains the diversity of life forms through natural selection, but it may conflict with religious beliefs for some individuals.
Creationism, as a belief, a philosophy and a mindset, would be defined as an abstract noun; creationism as an event or a process would be a concrete noun. Nouns have no opposites; you cannot get "negative-creation" in the same way as you can get 1 and -1.
The important issue is that the Question does not ask about the impact of evolution, but the impact of evolutionism. "Evolutionism" is defined as the belief that evolution explains the origin of species.The body of science relating to evolution should not be considered "evolutionism", since the term suggests belief, rather than knowledge and scientific theory. Nevertheless, creationists tend to use the term to suggest that the Theory of Evolution and creationism should be treated as equal concepts.Arguably, since the term "evolutionism" is mainly used by creationists, it is creationists themselves who are mainly impacted by evolutionism.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
They don't. Creationism is an ideology that crosses many cultures and religions and has many unsupported statements about human nature; most of it dead wrong and some of it just common sense observation. The theory of evolution by natural selection has a richly supported by the evidence vies of human nature and how humans acquired such natures.
Franz Boas was a widely renowned anthropologist. He was not involved with evolutionism.
I forgot where I read this, but I read somewhere that Jainism supports neither Creationism nor Evolutionism. Rather, they believe that the human species and all other species have always been here in their present form.
Jesus
morgan
survival of the fittest
Science and religion are not opposites, the terms have many parts of themselves that oppose eachother. For science, there is creationism and evolutionism, creationism is the scientific theory that the universe was made by an anti-matter life form called a god, due to contemporarily unknown powers that made the energy to make matter. Evolutionism supports the big bang theory, an atomic meltdown that formed matter from the traces of the explosion. For religion, faith is found mostly all of them, if not, then you're an atheist. Don't feel down if people say atheism is rare, they just have so much belief in their core, along with the ones around them, that they're blinded towards the ones that want sense in what goes on in life.
"Evolutionism" is a condescending term used by creationists or intelligent design supporters to suggest that evolution is only a belief system, or that it is somehow not scientific. The correct term is "evolutionary science" or simply "evolution".
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.