Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
Creationism is not considered a science because it is based on religious beliefs rather than empirical evidence and the scientific method. Science relies on observable data, experimentation, and peer review to support its claims, while creationism is rooted in faith and does not follow the same rigorous scientific standards.
No. Teaching creationism alongside evolutionary theory would suggest that they are equivalent explanations. They are not. Evolutionary theory is a well-established scientific model; creationism is a religious myth, and should be taught as such.
science is about discovering new things via the scientific method. For example, discovering new bacteria which may cause a new disease by isolating the bacteria, growing it and sequencing its DNA for example. applied science is using science for other purposes. all doctors and physiotherapists are applied scientists.
Creationism can and should be taught in a sociology classroom setting, but not in a science classroom like some people want it to be. The reason for this is that creationism is not a scientific theory or even principle, it's part of cultural mythology.
Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by extensive evidence, and should be taught in science classes. Creationism, however, is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence, so it is not appropriate to be taught in a science classroom. It may be more suitable for discussion in courses on religion or philosophy.
Engineering
There are two categories of scientific knowledge. One is basic science and the other is applied science. It is generally the applied science used for specific goals. At the same time, all the applied sciences are researched through the basic sciences.There are two categories of scientific knowledge. One is basic science and the other is applied science. It is generally the applied science used for specific goals. At the same time, all the applied sciences are researched through the basic sciences.
Yes. Creation "science" is not science at all. Science is the method by which a conclusion is drawn based on observations. Creationists already have their conclusion, and interpret select observations based on that conclusion. Creation "science" has no actual scientific backing. Answer 2 No. Creationism is perfectly valid as a historical example of the relationship between faith and science, and what happens when dogma becomes more important than the basis for the belief itself. Creationism should of course be much restricted from the science classes, as it is not scientific at all, but it has had a decent impact in religious studies/theology, history, social studies, law..
'Atheists' are a general grouping, not a specific one.Many have no opinion on the subject, and allow expert opinions to weigh the matter on their behalf.Some refuse the admission of creationism in public education as science (although private education may do what it pleases) because it is inherently unscientific and in many places, illegal to do so. Evolution is accepted because of its scientific support.Others make acceptance for creationism taught in religious classes, which is fair enough.
Applied science refers to the practical application of scientific principles to solve real-world problems. For example, engineers use applied science to develop new technologies that improve energy efficiency. In medical fields, applied science helps in creating innovative treatments and diagnostic tools. Overall, it bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical implementation.
Richard Dawkins is the Charles Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science, at Oxford University. In this position, he clearly has a sound understanding of scientific issues such as evolution and the creation of the universe. This has led him to believe that Creationism is inherently untrue. Since his role is to advance the public understaning of Science, he has written books such as The God Delusion(Bantam Press, 2006) to explain his views.I think that Professor Dawkins sees Creationism as dependently linked to religious belief. Where he views Creationism to contend with Science, which he asserts is quite often, Dawkins prefers to focus on the inherent failure of the underlying religious belief rather than simply demonstrating the error of the Creationist belief and leaving the proponent to continue in his or her religious beliefs.The debate around creationism and evolution is more fully covered in: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Creationism is not taught in Ohio public schools as part of the science curriculum. It may be taught in a cultural or sociological classroom setting, depending on the teacher or school. Only evolution is taught as a scientific theory for the origin of life in biology/science classes.