Later this month, the UN General Assembly is going to meet to discuss this safe Immigration, which concerns everyone. Current resettlement policies are stringent, requiring two to three years of examination. Refugees do not have a choice as to where they will be sent. The people coming in now to the US and other places have been in pipeline for several years already. Many more thousands have recently left Syria, and the concern is to have the same stringent vetting as well as acting in a timely manner. This is a difficult situation, since not only are these people fleeing a dangerous, war torn, area, but they are having to start their lives anew in a strange place, where many people are suspicious of them due to their ethnicity.
Simply put, there is no way to completely remove the risk of Jihadists infiltrating the migrant population, but you can substantially lower the likelihood that this will happen by creating a vetting process that can establish with reasonable certainty what the intentions of the migrants are.
The vetting system used by the United States to determine refugee status and asylum requests is one of the most stringent in the developed world and a model policy for other countries to look at. It requires written submissions to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and interviews with its personnel. If they are approved by UNHCR, the candidates are interviewed and vetted by the FBI National Counterterrorism Center, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security. Fingerprints are taken, biographical information is collected, and each migrant is individually interviewed by U.S. officials trained to verify their particular stories of abuse and flight as well as to verify that they're bona fide refugees (and not economic migrants, intending to cause terrorism/distress, or Non-Syrians who have just destroyed their documents). All of the vetting occurs while the migrant is still outside of US territory and takes 1-4 years.
Compare this to Germany's open invitation to anyone claiming to be a refugee. Such a policy allows anyone to effectively become a "Syrian refugee" and leads to numerous people who are not Syrians and not refugees to take advantage of the kindness.
Pressure Governments of those countries to change.
Answer this question…Governments were forced to pay for food and shelter for poor refugees in their countries.
Governments were forced to pay for food and shelter for poor refugees in their countries
Some countries close their borders to refugees due to concerns about security, economic strain, and social cohesion. They may feel overwhelmed by the number of refugees entering their country and fear that refugees will compete for jobs and resources, or pose a threat to national security. Political considerations and public opinion also play a role in border closure decisions.
In general refugees are from the country from which they have fled.
people become refugees by leaving their countries because of corrupt governments or they are living in war zones and leave their countries because it is unsafe
Countries like Germany, UK accepts christian refugees. But not limited to them only.
Various organizations and countries provide support to refugees, including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), International Rescue Committee (IRC), Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), and numerous other non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Governments also play a role in providing assistance and resettlement programs for refugees.
Australia's refugees mainly come from countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan.
We have not Romanian refugees, only adventurers eager for money.
Rwandan refugees go to their neighboring countries, for example Zaire and Uganda. Burundi is not a safe place for refugees.
Most First and Second World Countries..