Guns can and are a protective measure in the hands of a lawful, responsible, level headed citizen, law enforcement officer, and military personnel.
If the carrying of a concealed firearm was more excepted and more responsible, law abiding citizens did so, society would be exponentially safer.
Say a nut job with a gun ran into a mall shooting everyone in sight; men, women children, young, and old. If a responsible gun owner who was properly trained ( which I strongly recommend ) had their weapon, they would be able to take the bad guy out.
If the US bans guns, it will only take the guns away from law abiding citizens. The criminals who commit all the gun violence do not care about gun laws and will ALWAYS be able to obtain a firearm.
It is only the good guys that would be effected by a gun ban.
If EVERY responsible, law abiding, legal citizens carried a firearm, criminals would be very reluctant to commit any crime against a person.
No. People with guns protect homes.
Obviously, if used responsibly, guns can be used to protect people. A gun is a tool; used for the purpose it was intended, it can be a deterrent or can be used for defense.
Get some cannons and automatic guns
Depends a bit on where you live and what you do for a living. But most people are able to live just fine without using guns to protect themselves.
Guns are to protect people and not for killing people because killing people for no reason is a crime but killing people to protect your self is not a crime
cannonns<\ guns</etc
Machine Guns... Nuff said.
Carbon steel guns are usually blued to protect from rust. Stainless guns are left as is.
So they can protect themselves from the other army. Plus, they don't always use guns.
Yes if it is protect thou from different murderers
So they can protect the important people in there
they used it as a weapon to protect them selves there enimies