0
How can i tell what is true when my wife confessed but now says she was lying?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
The TRUTH is right there in front of you, Dude! You can't believe anything other than the fact that you're being "Played like a Harp"-She was dumping on you-her plan backfired, and your're the "back-up" plan-just in case it didn't work...Let me guess, she cheated on you, felt guilty about it, realized she really loved you...blah blah blah...Did her "Boyfriend" dump her? Or are YOU the "BBD"? (BIGGER, BETTER DEAL) Whatever the scenario is, she's either got personality disorder issues, or she's a schizophrenic in identity crisis. Look for a door marked "EXIT". If they've cheated on someone else in the past-it will happen to you too later down the road. People like that are VERY insecure and need constant attention to feel better about themselves. They constantly seek new conquests and cheap thrills to validate themselves as a person. It can be exhausting feeding a ravenous ego like that if you are the one that is a slave to it. Is it really worth it?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
In situations like this, it can be challenging to determine the truth. It's important to have open and honest communication with your spouse. Seek clarity by expressing your concerns and emotions and give your spouse the opportunity to explain herself. It may also be helpful to consider seeking professional help, such as couples therapy, to work through this difficult situation together.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A book has 1000 pages page 1 says 1 page is lying page 2 says 2 pages are lying page 1000 says 1000 pages are lying which one is telling the truth?
Page 999 Explanation: There are (presumably) 1000 pages in the book. All of them are lying except for one. Going through the pattern, Page 999 says 999 pages are lying. That is true All of them are telling the truth because all of them say they are lying and that is true.
What is an example of paradoxes?
The below statement is false. The above statement is true. I am lying. I am lying when I say I am lying.
When a guy says sex brings you closer together is it true or is he just out to get in your pants?
he is lying. dont believe it.
Is it true that Hinata told naruto she loved him?
Yes Hinata did tell Naruto that she loved him. Naruto was fighting Pain and Hinata rushed in to help and then she confessed to him.
What is the difference between lying and exaggerating?
The differences between lying and exaggerating is that when you are exaggerate you can go over board but some of it may not be true. But if you tell a lie then you aren't telling the truth.
Can music tell lies?
Only if in the lyrics it says something that is known to be not true.
How can you tell in what the spirit in the glass says is true?
You would have to wait and see what happens.
Why would a true friend tell you the truth when you don't want to hear it?
AnswerBecause that's what true friends do. When everyone else is lying to you and playing games a true friend will not. They will tell you the truth because it's something you NEED to hear if even you don't want to.
How can you tell if the guy you like is lying about NOT liking you?
It is best to accept what people say as true. If you don't do this people will not feel comfortable knowing you.
King Henry IV eventually confessed his treachery in deposing Richard II?
True
Who do you believe if your husband confessed out of supposed guilt when you were dating that he slept with your best friend but she completely denied it?
You should believe your husband. No man would tell something that could destroy his relationship unless it was true.
A man walks up to you and says - everything I say to you is a lie Is he telling the truth or lying?
It's a paradox, if you answer anyway is wrong.If he's telling the truth them he would be lying, if he was lying then he would be telling the truth.He's lyingThere's no paradox. Just because it's not true that he always lies does not mean that he never lies. He lies sometimes, just like everyone else.Now, if he said 'This sentence is a lie', that would be a paradox.Indeed there is no paradox. The definition of a paradox implies that something is both true and false. There is a big mistake in the quite commonly accepted explanation from above: "if he was lying then he would be telling the truth". If someone lies, then he's NOT telling the truth, because he's lying. If he's lying when making this statement, the definition of lying implies that the statement itself is a lie, meaning in this case that he's not always lying. If he's telling the truth when saying he always lies, then that statement is also a lie, because he isn't always lying, he just told the truth. Actually, it doesn't matter if he's lying or telling the truth because either way this statement is a lie so it can never be true. Hence it's not a paradox.(For the statement to be true it can never be spoken out loud. Because when you tell someone you always lie, either you have to tell the truth about that which makes your statement false again or you lie about always lying, which again makes this statement a lie)ParadoxIf a man says, "I always lie", then the moment before he said it, it could have been either true or false that he always lies. If the man had ever told the truth, at any time in his life prior to making this statement, then the statement is simply false, and he is lying.But consider what happens if the statement was true prior to him saying so. If every word ever spoken by this man, prior to making that statement, was a lie, then it would have been accurate for someone else to say, about him, "he always lies". However, the moment he said it himself, he has told the truth, for once in his life, So, at first analysis, the statement is true.However, if the statement is true, then his "perfect record" of lying is no longer intact, i.e., it is no longer true that he "always lies", making the statement false the moment it is uttered.So far, that is in agreement with those who claim there is no paradox. However, those claims fail to carry this scenario all the way out. You see, if the statement is false, as we have just established, then the man's "perfect record" of lying is now intact once again. And it is true that he "always lies", making the statement true.But if the statement is true, then it is no longer true that he always lies, and therefore the statement is false. But if the statement is false then it is again true that he always lies, and so the statement is true.And on and on and on. That is why this is a paradox (if the statement was true before he said it). If it is true, it is false; and if it is false, it is true. Simply being true makes it false. Simply being false makes it true. So it is true and false at the same time. I think someone said that was the very definition of a paradox.So to summarize, if the man had ever told the truth prior to making this statement, then this statement is simply false. However, if he had never told the truth prior to making this statement, then the statement is, in fact, a paradox.
