0
How can such apparently reliable evidence lead an auditor to an improper conclusion?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
The auditor apparently is misinterpreting the reliable evidence presented to them.
It would be advisable to have an experienced, licensed (CPA/EA) tax representative working for you to aid in this matter.
Taxpayers such as yourself often mislead auditors with how they present information to them.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoEven with such apparently reliable evidence an auditor can still be lead to an improper conclusion due to human error. If you feel the conclusion was not correct you may want to consider appealing the decision if possible.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How can a conclusion be validated?
A conclusion can be validated by providing supporting evidence or data that directly links back to the main points made in the argument. It is important to ensure that the evidence is reliable, relevant, and logically sound. Additionally, peer review and critical analysis can help confirm the validity of the conclusion.
What is antidotal evidence?
A grammatical mistake. It is meant to say "anecdotal evidence" which is evidence that may be true but could be unreliable and may or may not lead to the desired conclusion. It is as opposed to "scientific evidence" which may be held as reliable.
What is antidotal?
A grammatical mistake. It is meant to say "anecdotal evidence" which is evidence that may be true but could be unreliable and may or may not lead to the desired conclusion. It is as opposed to "scientific evidence" which may be held as reliable.
What mistake is the reason that lead to an invalid conclusion?
One mistake that can lead to an invalid conclusion is using faulty logic, such as making hasty generalizations or relying on anecdotal evidence. It's important to ensure that the reasoning process is sound and based on reliable information and logical arguments to reach a valid conclusion.
How reliable is DNA fingerprinting?
It is not infallable, but it is considered reliable enough to be use as evidence.
Based on no reliable evidence?
ill founded
How can you tell if your hypothesis is reliable?
If the conclusion you draw from the data supports your hypothesis.
Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable it is to be considered what?
When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
Conclusion must be based on several evidence?
Conclusions based on multiple pieces of evidence are more robust and reliable because they consider a broader set of information. By synthesizing various data points, trends, and sources, a conclusion can be more comprehensive and less prone to biases or errors that might arise from relying on a single piece of evidence. This approach also helps in developing a better understanding of the complexity of the issue at hand.
Who was the father of apostles?
There are no known reliable evidence regarding the fathers of apostles.
Why are fingerprints left on plastic bags less reliable as evidence?
cb
