0
The s community requested more information for this question. Please edit your question to include more context.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Conclusions based on multiple pieces of evidence are more robust and reliable because they consider a broader set of information. By synthesizing various data points, trends, and sources, a conclusion can be more comprehensive and less prone to biases or errors that might arise from relying on a single piece of evidence. This approach also helps in developing a better understanding of the complexity of the issue at hand.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What it means when psychologists state that scientific theories must be supported by empirical evidence.?
When psychologists state that scientific theories must be supported by empirical evidence, they are emphasizing the importance of using objective data and observations to validate or refute their theories. Empirical evidence refers to information that is obtained through systematic investigation and observation in the real world, rather than relying on personal opinions or beliefs. This process helps ensure that psychological theories are based on reliable and verifiable information, promoting the credibility and validity of the field.
Differences between psychology and common sense?
Psychology relies on scientific research and systematic methods to study human behavior and mental processes, whereas common sense is based on everyday observations, personal experiences, and general knowledge. Psychology aims to provide explanations and theories that are supported by empirical evidence, while common sense may rely on intuition and anecdotal evidence. Psychology fosters a deeper understanding of human behavior through rigorous study and analysis, while common sense may be more intuitive and practical in nature.
The APA code of ethics states that all research participants must be given a full explanation of the nature and purpose of any study after its conclusion This process is called?
This process is called a debriefing.
What is the difference between an absolute threshold and a decision threshold?
The absolute threshold refers to the minimum level of stimulation needed for a sensory system to detect a stimulus. The decision threshold is the point at which a person decides whether a stimulus is present or absent based on the strength of the stimulus compared to a set criterion.
For a scientific claim to be meaningful it must be capable of being disproven This is the critical thinking principle of?
falsifiability. This principle suggests that for a scientific claim to be valid, it must be testable and potentially refutable through evidence and observation. By being able to be disproven, scientific claims can be rigorously tested and evaluated for accuracy.
Why would the conclusion to a research essay be debatable?
It is based on data that must be interpreted.
What does a posteriori mean in philosophy?
In philosophy, a posteriori refers to knowledge that is gained through experience or observation. This type of knowledge is empirical, based on evidence gathered from the external world rather than through pure reason alone. A posteriori knowledge is contrasted with a priori knowledge, which is derived from reason and does not require empirical evidence.
What argument is based on facts that can be proven true and contains a conclusion that must be true if the premises are true?
A deductive argument fits this description. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This type of argument moves from general premises to a specific conclusion through logical reasoning.
What do you think must be done if the conclusion does not support a hypothesis?
When you draw picture than you will need to repeat several times
What must a conclusion state?
A conclusion must state how someone solved its problem.
Is a logical statement in which the conclusion is guaranteed to be true?
It must be proven to be true by several different individuals not known to each other.
Darwins opinion that living forms must be descended from extinct forms?
It was based on fossil evidence
What would be a good conclusion if you were writing a story about the Bermuda triangle?
Your conclusion must come last - it's based on whatever you wrote in your essay about the Bermuda Triangle. We can't give you a conclusion because we didn't write or read your essay.
How do you adopt evidence based practice in own work setting?
As medical research uncovers new evidence, so current working practises must take the new evidence into account. Tested recommended procedures must then be taught and practised.
What must be true of a conclusion of a controlled experiment?
A conclusion must show that the hypothesis is correct
What are the three steps involved in the development of a scientific law?
To develop a scientific law a person must first start off with an experiment or hypothesis. A person will then need evidence to support their theory/hypothesis. If the evidence is sufficient enough then they must provide a conclusion explaining their findings and how they are correct.
How do you find what evidence the DA has?
Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.
