pringpirgnip
A deductive argument fits this description. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This type of argument moves from general premises to a specific conclusion through logical reasoning.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity is not concerned with the truth of the premises or conclusion, only the logical relationship between them.
Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.
Fallacies of presumption occur when an argument is based on an unjustified assumption or presupposition. Examples include begging the question (assuming the truth of the conclusion in the premise), false dilemma (presenting only two options when more exist), and complex question (posing a question that assumes something not yet proven).
"Begging the question" is a logical fallacy in which the conclusion of an argument is assumed in one of the premises, without any evidence or support. It occurs when someone's argument presupposes the truth of what they are trying to prove, making the argument circular and logically flawed.
I can support my point with facts and data from reputable sources. By citing studies, research papers, expert opinions, or documented evidence, I can provide a strong foundation for my arguments and demonstrate the validity of my claims.
C. testedtested and proven to be true.
An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.
A "reasoned argument" is a series of statements that use evidence and reasoning to persuade someone to accept or reject a particular opinion. A special case of a reasoned argument is the valid deductive argument. If you accept the premises of a valid deductive argument, then it would be absurd to reject its conclusion. Unfortunately, in many cases it is impossible to put together a valid deductive argument either for or against some important statement. And so we must muddle along with whatever weaker evidence and weaker reasoning we have available to form a reasoned argument and come to some useful opinion one way or the other. Unfortunately, too many people make statements without any evidence or reasoning at all.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity is not concerned with the truth of the premises or conclusion, only the logical relationship between them.
A Conclusion.
A hypothesis is the idea of what the conclusion will be of your experiment.
Diagram
conclusion
I believe that a conclusion is a proven idea or experiment with complete evidence, while a theory cannot be totally proven but has been tested enough to be widely believed and accepted by the scientific community.
Facts need to be proven by strong evidence, data, and reliable sources. They should be verifiable and supported by research or empirical observations to establish their accuracy and credibility.
Because a conclusion indicates that it is no longer a theory, but a proven fact. A theory is an unproven hypothesis.
thesis statement