answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

pringpirgnip

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

5d ago

A deductive argument fits this description. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This type of argument moves from general premises to a specific conclusion through logical reasoning.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What argument is based on facts that can be proven true and contains a conclusion that must be true if the premises are true?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What makes an argument valid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity is not concerned with the truth of the premises or conclusion, only the logical relationship between them.


What are presumptive arguments based on?

Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.


What are fallacies of presumption?

Fallacies of presumption occur when an argument is based on an unjustified assumption or presupposition. Examples include begging the question (assuming the truth of the conclusion in the premise), false dilemma (presenting only two options when more exist), and complex question (posing a question that assumes something not yet proven).


What is begging the question mean?

"Begging the question" is a logical fallacy in which the conclusion of an argument is assumed in one of the premises, without any evidence or support. It occurs when someone's argument presupposes the truth of what they are trying to prove, making the argument circular and logically flawed.


Back up your arguments with evidence?

I can support my point with facts and data from reputable sources. By citing studies, research papers, expert opinions, or documented evidence, I can provide a strong foundation for my arguments and demonstrate the validity of my claims.

Related questions

A hypothesis only becomes a valid argument conclusion after it has been?

C. testedtested and proven to be true.


Which term describes an argument that has not yet been proven?

An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.


What is a reasonable argument?

A "reasoned argument" is a series of statements that use evidence and reasoning to persuade someone to accept or reject a particular opinion. A special case of a reasoned argument is the valid deductive argument. If you accept the premises of a valid deductive argument, then it would be absurd to reject its conclusion. Unfortunately, in many cases it is impossible to put together a valid deductive argument either for or against some important statement. And so we must muddle along with whatever weaker evidence and weaker reasoning we have available to form a reasoned argument and come to some useful opinion one way or the other. Unfortunately, too many people make statements without any evidence or reasoning at all.


What makes an argument valid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity is not concerned with the truth of the premises or conclusion, only the logical relationship between them.


What is a hypothesis that has been proven again and again?

A Conclusion.


Is a hypothesis a proven fact?

A hypothesis is the idea of what the conclusion will be of your experiment.


What is a mathematical statement consisting of a hypothesis and conclusion that has to be proven true?

Diagram


What name is given to a statement that has been proven by deductive reasoning?

conclusion


What does a conclusion vary from a theory?

I believe that a conclusion is a proven idea or experiment with complete evidence, while a theory cannot be totally proven but has been tested enough to be widely believed and accepted by the scientific community.


What needs to be proven by facts?

Facts need to be proven by strong evidence, data, and reliable sources. They should be verifiable and supported by research or empirical observations to establish their accuracy and credibility.


How a scientific theory different from a conclusion?

Because a conclusion indicates that it is no longer a theory, but a proven fact. A theory is an unproven hypothesis.


The conclusion of a proven hypothesis becomes a when it is modified to answer the research question?

thesis statement