Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
What_is_initial_credibility
When you cannot find any other sources that supports its arguments.
The Vietnam War
Provide evidence of how they had been mistreated
by checking how transparent the source's author is
The authority of the author to write about the subject -Apex
to determine a sources credibility ~ apex
Yes.
To examine a source's credibility, consider factors such as the author's expertise on the topic, the source's reputation and publication date, and the presence of citations and references. Evaluate the source's objectivity, potential bias, and its alignment with other reputable sources. Look out for red flags like sensational language, lack of supporting evidence, and a lack of peer review.
Sources should be evaluated for credibility, reliability, accuracy, and relevance to ensure the information is trustworthy and appropriate for the intended purpose. Check the author's credentials, publication date, potential biases, and supporting evidence to determine the credibility of a source.
I evaluate the credibility of information based on the author's expertise, the publication source, the timeliness of the information, and whether the information is supported by reliable sources or citations. Additionally, I consider any potential biases or conflicts of interest that may impact the accuracy of the information.
"Credibility" is the state of being believable. An authority or statement a person is likely to believe has a lot of credibility. Sometimes other factors make such a source even more believable; in that case the other factors are said to "lend credibility" to the original statement or source. This means the same as to "add credibility". E.g. "I generally believe what Mr. X says about unemployment, and this recent report lends credibility to his statements."
1. What are three factors that could contribute to the credibility of a source?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 2.
When evaluating the reliability of a source, consider the author's expertise, credibility, and bias. Assess the publication date, relevance, and accuracy of the information. Look for corroborating sources and fact-check the content to determine its trustworthiness.
being about to trust and rely on the message that was given
The authority of the author to write about the subject ywwwww :)