0
Most courts use the word "docket" to mean the court calendar of future cases. In Florida, the word "docket" often means records of past cases. Since you're asking about a 2007 case, I'll assume you mean the court record.
The first related source is the Florida official records search page, where you can search by name, county, document type, and date range. Searches are free, but there is a charge for records requested. You will be able to see what cases were heard on 07/30/07 without charge.
I found this at the second related source, which has links to all Florida online case record searches. You can also use the "Choose a Court Resource Category" and select "View Dockets and Calendars" to see the calendar of future cases. If you need to contact the court clerk, you can also select your county to get contact information for all courts in that county.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you use docket in a sentence?
I checked the docket to see when the next court hearing was scheduled.
Where can you find the kanawha county magistrate court DOCKET FOR November 2 2009?
Contact the office of the Clerk of the Court. All public records are available. If a judge seals them they may have data on the docket, however, you can not see the record unless the record is unsealed.
Can a person walk into a Colorado Adams County Courthouse and see a judge the same day by simply placing your name on the docket?
A person cannot walk into a courthouse - not in Adams County, not in any United States court - and place their name on a docket or see a judge. The docket is a list of cases to be heard by the court; individuals can look at court dockets, but not add to or modify them. The docket contains only cases that have been properly filed; it does not contain individual appointments. Judges are not permitted to speak to parties in a case unless the other party is also present. Normally a judge will only speak to the parties' attorneys, not directly to a party - unless that party does not have an attorney. In order to "get on a docket" you have to start a case by filing the proper forms with the court clerk. You still won't get to speak to the judge, unless it's in a court proceeding that has been put on the docket by the court, and the other party's attorney is also present. The first related link below has general information about the Colorado court process, and how to represent yourself. I found it at the second related link, which has contact information for the courts in Adams County (as well as the rest of Colorado) and links to additional online resources related to the courts.
Are court cases public record?
If listed on a current or archived docket then yes. Some cases never see the inside of a court room. For instance there may be a case number but no date or a case may be threatened then settled out of court. Cases listed on a docket will be reviewed by a judge in open court and the clerk/recorder will log all of these into the public record.
What cases are currently on the US Supreme Court docket for the 2011 2012 term?
The Supreme Court of the United States hosts its own web site that maintains the docket, calendar, merits briefs, slip opinions and other information about cases being heard in the current Term.The following cases are currently scheduled for the Supreme Court's 2009 Term. There may be additions or changes to the list in the future. You can read the merit briefs for each case at the SCOTUS website (see Related Links, below).US Supreme Court Docket 2009 Term(Retrieved March 26, 2010)Abbott v. Abbott, Docket No. 08-645Alabama v. North Carolina, Docket No. 132 Orig.Alvarez v. Smith, Docket No. 08-351American Needle v. National Football League, Docket No. 08-661Arave v. Hoffman, Docket No. 07-110Astrue, Comm'r of Social Security v. Ratliff, Docket No. 08-1322Barber v. Thomas, Warden, Docket No. 09-5201Beard, Sec. of PA DOC v. Kindler, Docket No. 08-992Berghuis, Warden, v. Smith, Docket No. 08-1402Berghuis, Warden, v. Thompkins, Docket No. 08-1470Bilski v. Kappos, Docket No. 08-964Black v. United States, Docket No. 08-876Bloate v. United States, Docket No. 08-728Brisoce v. Virginia, Docket No. 07-11191Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, Att'y Gen., Docket No. 09-60Carr v.United States, Docket No. 08-1301Christian Legal Society Chapter v. Martinez, Docket No. 08-1371Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Docket No. 08-205City of Ontario, CA v. Quon, Docket No. 08-1332Conkright v. Frommert, Docket No. 08-810Doe #1 v. Reed, WA Sec. of State, Docket No. 09-559Dolan v. United States, Docket No. 09-367Dillon v. United States, Docket No. 09-6338Florida v. Powell, Docket No. 08-1175Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., Docket No. 08-861Graham v. Florida, Docket No. 08-7412 and Sullivan v. Florida, Docket No. 08-7621 (consolidated)Graham County Soil v. United States, Docket No. 08-304Granite Rock Company v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Docket No. 08-1214Hamilton v. Lanning, Docket No. 08-998Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins., Docket No. 09-448Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York, NY, Docket No. 08-969Health Care Service v. Pollitt, Docket No. 09-38Hertz Corporation v. Friend, Docket No. 08-1107Holder, Att'y Gen., v. Humanitarian Law Project, Docket No. 08-1498 and Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder, Att'y Gen., Docket No. 09-89Holland v. Florida, Docket No. 09-5327Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Docket No. 07-480Hui v. Castaneda, Docket No. 08-1529Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Docket No. 08-1200Johnson v. United States, Docket No. 08-6925Jones v. Harris Associates, Docket No. 08-586Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha v. Regal-Beliot Corp., Docket No. 08-1553 and Union Pacific Railroad Co., v. Regal-Beliot Corp., Docket No. 08-1554Kiyemba v. Obama, Docket No. 08-1234Krupski v. Costa Crociere, Docket No. 09-337Kucana v. Holder, Attny Gen., Docket No. 08-911Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc., Docket No. 09-223Lewis v. City of Chicago, IL, Docket No. 08-974Mac's Shell Service v. Shell Oil Products, Docket No. 08-240 and Shell Oil Products v. Mac's Shell Service, Docket No. 08-372 (consolidated)Magwood v. Culliver, Docket No. 09-158Maryland v. Shatzer, Docket No. 08-680McDonald v. City of Chicago, IL, Docket No. 08-1521McDaniel v. Brown, Docket No. 08-559Merck & Co., Inc., v. Reynolds, Docket No. 08-905Milavetz v. United States, Docket No. 08-1119 and United States v. Milavetz, Docket No. 08-1225 (consolidated)Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, Docket No. 09-475Morrison v. National Australia Bank LTD, Docket No. 08-1191New Process Steel v. NLRB, Docket No. 08-1457NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities, Docket No. 08-674Padilla v. Kentucky, Docket No. 08-651Perdue, Gov. of GA v. Kenny A., Docket No. 08-970Pottawattamie County, IA v. McGhee, Docket No. 08-1065Reed Elsevier, Inc., v. Muchnick, Docket No. 08-103Renico, Warden v. Lett, Docket No. 09-338Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson, Docket No. 09-497Robertson v. United States, Ex Rel. Watson, Docket No. 08-6261Salazar, Sec. of Interior v. Buono, Docket No. 08-472Samantar v. Yousuf, Docket No. 08-1555Schwab v. Reilly, Docket No. 08-538Shady Grove Orthopedic Assoc., v. Allstate Insurance, Docket No. 08-1008Skilling v. United States, Docket No. 08-1394Smith, Warden v. Spisak, Docket No. 08-724South Carolina v. North Carolina, Docket No. 138, OriginalStolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeeds International, Docket No. 08-1198Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Dept. of Enviromental Protection, Docket No. 08-1151Union Pacific Railroad Co., v. Brotherhood of Locomotive, Docket No. 08-604United States v. Comstock, Docket No. 08-1224United States v. Marcus, Docket No. 08-1341United States v. O'Brien, Docket No. 08-1569United States v. Stevens, Docket No. 08-769United Student Aid Funds v. Espinosa, Docket No. 08-1134Weyhrauch v. United States, Docket No. 08-1196Wood v. Allen, Comm'r, AL DOC Docket No. 08-9156For more information, see Related Links and Related Questions, below.
What is the US Supreme Court docket?
The Supreme Court's docket is like an agenda of cases to be heard during a particular Term (cases are usually argued two weeks per month, between the first Monday in October and the end of April).The docket contains information that helps justices, parties to the case and the public quickly locate important information about the case, such as case name, docket number(s), status, etc.The website On the Docket (see Related Links, below) has a one or more pages dedicated to the docket of Supreme Court Terms from 2000 through the present (2009). Information is still being compiled for the current Term, so this page will change as the schedule is updated and more data becomes available.Information provided:Case nameDocket numberDate arguedDate decidedCourt appealed fromOutcome of caseVote countAuthor of official opinionTopic(s) of caseThis particular website also include brief new items related to the matters before the Court. The Supreme Court of the United States maintains its own website (Related Links) that shows a less detailed docket, but also offers a variety of materials not found elsewhere.
What explains the lasting importance of the decision in Marbury v Madison?
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Marbury v. Madison was an essentially meaningless case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803 in which the Court asserted the power of the Supreme Court to decide whether or not laws were constitutional. THAT is its lasting legacy, and every SCOTUS decision since cites Marbury v. Madison as their authority.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What best explains the lasting importance of the decision in Marbury v Madison?
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Marbury v. Madison was an essentially meaningless case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803 in which the Court asserted the power of the Supreme Court to decide whether or not laws were constitutional. THAT is its lasting legacy, and every SCOTUS decision since cites Marbury v. Madison as their authority.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Which precedent was established by the supreme court ruling in marbury v Madison?
well you see the federal states stop getting on this website to cheat on your test
How does the Supreme Court limit the of congress?
The Supreme Court holds the power of judicial review, meaning it can declare a law unconstitutional. The law would then be repealed, checking the power of congress. (see Marbury V. Madison)
What did Marbury v Madison establish?
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803) is often credited with establishing the right of judicial review, which increased the Court's power and made it more equal to the other branches of government. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to determine whether legislation is unconstitutional and to overturn those laws.For more in-depth information on Marbury v. Madison (1803), see Related Links, below.
Where is marbury vs Madison?
Marbury v. Madison, (1803) was held in the United States Supreme Court. By the time this case was heard, the US Capital had relocated from Philadelphia, PA, to Washington, DC. At the time, the Supreme Court occupied a chamber on the ground floor of the Capitol Building (now renovated and called the Old Supreme Court Chamber).Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
