A gladiator didn't have the authority to "ask". He would simply pause when he had subdued his opponent, look at the audience and the Emperor and receive a thumbs up or a thumbs down. "Thumbs up" his opponent lives. "Thumbs down" his opponent dies.
What kind of armor did you use/Do you want to kill me?/how did you become a gladiator
The rules of the gladiatorial contests varied. There was a senior referee, the summa rudis, and an assistant who had staffs (rudes) which were used to caution or separate opponents. These interventions were aimed at ensuring fair play. The referee could also pause the fight to for a rest. A winning gladiator who overwhelmed his opponent raised his index finger to ask what he was meant to do next (whether to spare or kill the gladiator who lost). A gladiator could acknowledge defeat by raising his index finger which signalled the summa rudis to stop the combat. He then cast aside his weapons, kneeled and raised his hand to ask for mercy. The referee would then refer this to the editor who was the producer of the fights. The editor made the final decision about the fate of gladiator. His decision usually rested on the wish of the spectators. A wounded gladiator laid down his shield and raised his left hand as a plea for mercy. When a gladiator went down the crowd often shouted Habet, Hoc habet! (He's had it!), and shouts of Mitte! (Let him go!) or Iugula! (Kill him!). An editor could decide whether or not the fights were going to be ad digitum (lasting to the "the finger") which meant that they stopped when the defeated gladiator raised his finger. In the latter case, the fight lasted until the spectators asked for the dismissal of the fighters. The editor then decided whether to accept this or let the fight continue to "the finger." The editor could also choose a game sine remissione (without dismissal). These were fights to the death. In some cases both gladiators were dismissed or released from the arena stantes missi (released standing).
Gladiators won prize money. They could also win their freedom after fulfilling certain obligations. If they performed in five bouts they were freed from their gladiatorial oaths and given freedom. If they performed exceptionally well in even a single bout, they could also be given their freedom on the spot.
Yes, they had certain rights. After five successful fights a gladiator had the right to be freed. This not only applied to slaves, but to those who were free men who swore an oath to their trainer/owner. They were also paid after every fight and were allowed to keep their money. After five years a free man could retire and go on to teach or become an instructor in the army which welcomed ex-gladiators as trainers.
The significance of Truman's decision not to ask Congress for a declaration of war in Korea led to accusation from Congress. Congress accused the president of usurping the powers of the legislative branch. He justified his actions stating the UN had requested aid for the Republic of Korea to find off attacks.
What kind of armor did you use/Do you want to kill me?/how did you become a gladiator
Yes, you can ask yourself about the consequences of your decision.
It has been done in the past. I recall seeing a band on tour crowd fund a fuel pump so they could continue their tour. Ask nice, you could get what you need.
I do not know. It is your decision to make. You could ask your friends or your family. :)
'CROWD SOURCING' is a source from the crowd. For instance, in a game show, if the contestant does not know what to do, he/she might ask the crowd. That is what crowd sourcing is.Crowdsourcing is the act of outsourcing tasks, traditionally performed by an employee or contractor, to an undefined, large group of people or community (a "crowd"), through an open call. - Wikipedia
Ask friends for their advice on Facebook
He asked the people to pray for him.
Its just a celebration. Some players ask the crowd to shout louder too.
That is not my decision, but the decision of God. You ask Him.
Decision To Ask Why - 2004 was released on: USA: 25 April 2004 (limited)
The rules of the gladiatorial contests varied. There was a senior referee, the summa rudis, and an assistant who had staffs (rudes) which were used to caution or separate opponents. These interventions were aimed at ensuring fair play. The referee could also pause the fight to for a rest. A winning gladiator who overwhelmed his opponent raised his index finger to ask what he was meant to do next (whether to spare or kill the gladiator who lost). A gladiator could acknowledge defeat by raising his index finger which signalled the summa rudis to stop the combat. He then cast aside his weapons, kneeled and raised his hand to ask for mercy. The referee would then refer this to the editor who was the producer of the fights. The editor made the final decision about the fate of gladiator. His decision usually rested on the wish of the spectators. A wounded gladiator laid down his shield and raised his left hand as a plea for mercy. When a gladiator went down the crowd often shouted Habet, Hoc habet! (He's had it!), and shouts of Mitte! (Let him go!) or Iugula! (Kill him!). An editor could decide whether or not the fights were going to be ad digitum (lasting to the "the finger") which meant that they stopped when the defeated gladiator raised his finger. In the latter case, the fight lasted until the spectators asked for the dismissal of the fighters. The editor then decided whether to accept this or let the fight continue to "the finger." The editor could also choose a game sine remissione (without dismissal). These were fights to the death. In some cases both gladiators were dismissed or released from the arena stantes missi (released standing).
You ask her. If she chooses to tell you or not is her decision. What you choose to do or not after is your decision.