Want this question answered?
more education, learning better manners and etiquette and above all, proper grammar.
Ancient Egypt had three main social classes--upper, middle, and lower. The upper class consisted of the royal family, rich landowners, government officials, important priests and army officers, and doctors. ... Ancient Egypt's class system was not rigid. People in the lower or middle class could move to a higher position.
a peasant cannot refuse to do is anything because it is an order for him
A knight was a member of the nobility, and that was his class. Anyone of any class could become a knight, however. There were no fixed rules imposed on the monarch who knighted people, in this respect.
The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.
more education, learning better manners and etiquette and above all, proper grammar.
aztecs
The limits of Feudalism is that it bound people to a certain class depending on who they were. This meant that there was never a chance that a peasant could become a knight or a king. They would always be locked into their social class.
Royalty
helping veterans pay for college and job trianing
With individualism anyone could pursue their dreams and be what they wanted and people could become at a higher class then they were originally at~! Awesome ain't it
No, a steward was not a peasant. Contrary to what is often stated, there was always a middle class in the Middle Ages, and stewards were members of the middle class. They were the equivalent of accountants or managers, and were educated, so they could keep notes and take care of bookkeeping.
Yes, social class can have an affect on your education as if you are from a lower class, this could hinder your opportunities and therefore leave you demoralised about education. however, higher class students face different problems as stereotypically they could be lazy towards education as they are supported financially and have no need for education. On the other hand a poorer students could do extremely well in an attempt to free themselves from poverty. whichever class you are in your mindset towards education is.
Anyone could, but to make a living it would have had to have been a person with enough money to have training. Usually the higher classes.
The people in the upper social class were kings, priests, government officials, and rich merchants. Upper class wives could also be in this class.
No because if your parents are peasants you are a peasant
By sucking dick