Want this question answered?
To save the army
While Lincoln is known for ending slavery, he felt that it had to be eliminated in an orderly (not an abrupt) manner. When he became president, his first priority, in keeping with his oath of office, was to preserve the Union and defend the Constitution. But almost immediately, southern states were beginning to secede from the Union, as a result of the slavery issue. Lincoln had previously been willing to allow states that already had slavery to maintain it, but when secession began, he saw the urgency of bringing slavery to an end, so that the union could be preserved. And it was then that he began writing what became the Emancipation Proclamation.
They hoped to save Samual Adams
Ross Perot
It was one of the Union victories that came just in time to revive Northern morale and save Lincoln from being voted out of office. Ironically, the capture of Atlanta was no part of Grant's strategy. It actually reflected Sherman's failure to destroy the Army of Tennessee. It was really a gesture that would make big headlines in the North.
Abraham Lincoln said this quoteMy paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that......
Jefferson Davis
By winning battles, so they could raid the Union ration stores and strip the boots of the dead Union troops to save them going barefoot.
To save the Union. To save the cotton revenues.
Lincoln went in it only to save the union
No doubt, President Lincoln expected a Radical Republican backlash at his controversial colonization plan. When once again Horace Greeley of the Republican newspaper the New York Tribune openly protested this the now famous statement of Lincoln's position is quoted below."My paramount objective in this struggle is to save the Union, and it not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it.; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving the others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help save the Union".
disliked slavery, but did not believe the fed. gov. could ban it in places it already exists. "this struggle is to save the Union, not to either save or destroy slavery"
President Lincoln endured the pressure of ending the Confederate rebellion and saving the Union from destruction. As an off-shoot of the Union victory, slavery was abolished via the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution passed in December of 1865 after Lincoln's assassination in April of that same year."My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union"He may not have as noble a man as generally acknowledged. He was fortunate it worked out the way it did, which fact seems to be the one that history remembers. With all due respect for Lincoln, the saving and reunification of the US was one of the greatest events in US history.
The fact that the Union won the Civil War saved the Union.
President Lincoln.
After his first true love died. His friends put Lincoln on a suicide watch. Lincoln said the only reason he did not kill himself is because he had not made a positive change in the world. Lincoln wanted to be remembered.
With the tight integration of the euro in the European Union, it is difficult for each nation to save their own economy without risking the well being of all other nations within the European Union. With the current instability, a collapse of the euro could lead to a situation similar to that of the Lehman brothers fallout. This leaves economists timid to apply any type of strong measures to save the EU.