The United Nations has whatever power its constituent members choose to give it.
Yes, it probably can be more effective. What that would entail though, I don't know.
The United Nations preceded the independence of the State of Israel. Israel, therefore, could not have created the United Nations.
The League of Nations was an early form of the United Nations. However, it was ineffective. Later, a new organization was formed, called the United Nations Organization (now referred to as the United Nations).that is so correct who ever made this
Could be United Nations Disarmament Committee.
Germany
The League did not have a powerful armed force and could not enforce the required resolutions. It could not keep its economic sanctions. It failed to prevent the second world war. Hence it was replaced by the United Nations.
the war with Germany ended in 1945. The United Nations did not start until about 1947 so the UN could not have ever invaded Germany...........
they could not overcome the United Nations resolve not to give in........
It changed the way people fought, and the nations who could create the best swords became more powerful.
So Great Britain could become even more powerful by claiming the new world first.
i think it was because the soliders were mad and they wanted 1) freedom 2) power and 3) money from other countries so they could become more powerful
Not sure but it could be 20 sep 1990
You mean like a 21st century version of 1800's England or the United States of the 1950's? Latin America's nations cannot become a superpower, because most of these lack enough population, technical and military outreach to become global, unlike say, China. The only two nations that could become highly influential include Mexico (GDP: 1.86 trillion, population: 116 million) and Brazil (GDP: 2.25 trillion, population: 194 million). However, both nations face huge challenges that limit their global stance, such as high levels of poverty and dependence on industrialized nations. Both could become regional powers and even major players in international politics, but unless both nations become developed, assertive and economically independent, their aspirations will always be cut short.