"Contaminate" is not an adjective that applies to verbally given testimony or written statements. It is applied to physical evidence of the type usually found at a crime scene or seized later in support of the investigation.
In certain cases in could but in a general term no it cannot, poorly collected evidence could contaminate it or even if obtained wrong could be thrown out and not be used as evidence that is why there are procedures to be followed.
i have contaminate the food by putting my dirty hand on the food.
Valid types of evidence in investigations and court include physical evidence (like fingerprints or DNA), documentary evidence (such as contracts or emails), and testimonial evidence (witness statements). Actions that could contaminate evidence include mishandling or altering physical evidence, failing to properly document the chain of custody, and making leading statements or assumptions that could influence witness testimony. Additionally, any unauthorized access to evidence or the presence of bias can compromise its integrity. Ensuring proper protocols are followed is crucial for maintaining the reliability of evidence in legal proceedings.
Absolutely not. Not only could these bags be improperly cleaned and carry transmittable diseases, but they could potentially contaminate the physical evidence of a crime scene.
Parol evidence.Parol evidence.Parol evidence.Parol evidence.
It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.
There are literally hundreds of textbooks written on this subject. A question this broad cannot be answered in this venue.
Not unless you had a written agreement that they could remodel and you would pay the costs. In the absence of a written agreement the person would need to provide enough evidence to prove there was a verbal contract.It all depends on the terms of your agreement.Not unless you had a written agreement that they could remodel and you would pay the costs. In the absence of a written agreement the person would need to provide enough evidence to prove there was a verbal contract.It all depends on the terms of your agreement.Not unless you had a written agreement that they could remodel and you would pay the costs. In the absence of a written agreement the person would need to provide enough evidence to prove there was a verbal contract.It all depends on the terms of your agreement.Not unless you had a written agreement that they could remodel and you would pay the costs. In the absence of a written agreement the person would need to provide enough evidence to prove there was a verbal contract.It all depends on the terms of your agreement.
A properly written contract, signed by both parties, is tangible evidence of an agreement that is indisputably "legally binding".Generally, the problem with verbal agreements is that there is no evidence they exist. There is only a "he said, and he said" situation. In order to bind the other party to a verbal agreement, the moving party would need to bring an action in a court of equity and provide the judge with enough outside evidence that there was a verbal contract between the parties and the other party has breached it. Without compelling outside evidence such as witnesses, the judge cannot find that any contract existed between the parties.
Verbal consideration refers to a promise or agreement that is made through spoken words rather than a written document. In contract law, verbal consideration still holds legal weight as long as there is evidence to support the agreement. However, written contracts are generally preferred because they provide clearer terms and evidence of the agreement.
Valid evidence in investigations and court includes physical evidence, eyewitness testimony, documents, and digital data that can be reliably verified. To avoid contaminating evidence or prejudicing investigations, ensure that you handle evidence carefully, maintain a clear chain of custody, and avoid discussing the case publicly. Additionally, follow established protocols for evidence collection and documentation, and be cautious in your statements to prevent bias or assumptions that could influence the investigation.
Simple answer: There is no such thing. Contracts MUST be written and signed by bothparties to be legally binding. There is an old saying, "A verbal contract is as good as the paper it is written on."