by being retard as hell
which country have the lowest ecological footprint.
ecological footprint
ecological footprint
If someone has a big ecological footprint, it means that they are doing many unhealthy things to the environment. Such as wasting things like electricity, gasoline, and heat. A person with a small ecological footprint usually uses things like electricity, gasoline, and heat responsibly, or they probably own something that helps reduce the waste of these things.
This would have to be the United States still. Despite their efforts the rest of the world is far more conditioned to recyleing than they are.A: A low ecological footprint is good. Actually the US is about the second highest in the world, after Dubai.
The measure that has been established to estimate carrying capacity and the share of each person is the ecological footprint.
Because that's how they measured how much material and energy each person used a day.
A recent study (WWF Living Planet Report: October 2008) names the top ten countries with the highest ecological footprint per head as: # United Arab Emirates (9.5 global hectares per person) # United States (9.4 gh) # Kuwait (8.9 gh) # Denmark (8.0 gh) # Australia (7.8 gh) # New Zealand (7.7 gh) # Canada (7.1 gh) # Norway (6.9 gh) # Estonia (6.4 gh) # Ireland. (6.3 gh) The lowest country is Malawi, in Africa with an ecological footprint per person of 0.5 gh World total per person: 2.7 gh High-income countries: 6.4 gh Middle-income countries: 2.2 gh Low-income countries: 1.0 gh
a biography abou a person who has has a major influence on the world
Drive an SUV; leave the lights burning in every room all night; hold the fridge door open for ten minutes every hour; run the air conditioning with wndows open. BUT.... ummmmm.. Why would you want to INCREASE your carbon foorprint when soooo many others are desperately trying to DECREASE the overall carbon footprint of humanity? We all have a fairly small footprint, this is a hype issue. Having said that, there is absolutely no reasonable reason to not want as small a carbon footprint (or any pollutant footprint) as possible. What you want to be careful of though is that you don't shrink your carbon foot print at the cost of a much larger real pollution foot print. High efficiency bulbs are a great example. They do decrease the power consumption at the terrible cost of Mercury mining, florescence being used and a far larger real pollution foot print. They sure feel good though.
"I am the most important person so remember me!" That is the quote that makes the difference. I hope this has answered you question and if not please contact me. Regards I.E. Proffessor of Valentins PhD university America, California
A great majority of the world's population would have to be killed.