Plato looked for the ideal government. Aristotle wanted to "consider, not only what form of government is best, but also what is possible and what is easily attainable."
That his idea was really good that it became the american government. ;D YOUR VERY WELCOME! LOL
Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.
He affected our lives because the Americans were influenced about his idea of a mixed government.
Plato wanted to achieve is a perfect society through rebuilding. Aristotle was unconcerned with creating a new, perfect society. He wanted to improve on the existing one through a deductive approach.
Aristotle preferred government by the many, not by the few.Like Plato,however,he was suspicious of democracy,which he thought could lead to mob rule.Instead,he was favored a constitutional government ruled by members of the middle class.
Aristotle had thought that the Earth was the Geo-centric or the center of the universe and everything circled or revolved around it. Copernicus thought that the Sun is the center of the universe. Copernicus' idea is called Helios-centric.
Aristotle
Aristotle believed in the mean. Therefore, he recommended a CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT (politi). First, it must be ruled by the middle class. Second, it is not one type of government but rather, mixture of democracy, oligarchy (mean), and with one element of aristocracy (i.e. distributive justice).
Aristotle viewed matter as possessing inherent qualities and characteristics that determined its natural behavior, while scientists see matter as composed of fundamental particles with specific properties that interact based on physical laws and forces. Aristotle's view was more qualitative and subjective, while the scientific understanding is more quantitative and objective.
Aristotle and Plato had contrasting views on government primarily regarding the ideal state and the role of the individual. Plato, in his work "The Republic," envisioned a philosopher-king ruling over a rigidly structured society based on ideal forms and absolute truths. In contrast, Aristotle, in "Politics," advocated for a more pragmatic approach, emphasizing the importance of the middle class and the need for a government that reflects the realities of human nature and the community's needs. While Plato sought an idealized, utopian government, Aristotle favored a more empirical analysis of political systems grounded in practical governance.
Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and lacked empty spaces, while scientists today understand matter to be composed of atoms and molecules with spaces between them. Additionally, Aristotle viewed matter as having inherent qualities and tendencies, whereas modern science explains matter in terms of interactions between fundamental particles governed by physical laws.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms used Aristotle's theory of natural rights as an inspiration. Natural rights are universally agreed upon by all mankind, and it is the duty of government to enforce these rights for the individual.