Aristotle viewed matter as possessing inherent qualities and characteristics that determined its natural behavior, while scientists see matter as composed of fundamental particles with specific properties that interact based on physical laws and forces. Aristotle's view was more qualitative and subjective, while the scientific understanding is more quantitative and objective.
Aristotle's idea of matter was based on a qualitative understanding where matter had inherent properties. In contrast, modern scientists view matter as composed of fundamental particles (atoms, subatomic particles) and focus on quantitative measurements and empirical evidence to describe matter's properties and behavior.
Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.
The scientist who believed in an indivisible, uncuttable particle was Democritus. He proposed the concept of "atomos," which means indivisible, as the smallest unit of matter that cannot be further divided. This idea laid the foundation for the development of the modern atomic theory.
Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and lacked empty spaces, while scientists today understand matter to be composed of atoms and molecules with spaces between them. Additionally, Aristotle viewed matter as having inherent qualities and tendencies, whereas modern science explains matter in terms of interactions between fundamental particles governed by physical laws.
The term for the false idea that the universe is nothing but matter in motion is materialism. It is a philosophical belief that denies the existence of anything beyond physical matter and its interactions.
Aristotle's idea of matter was based on a qualitative understanding where matter had inherent properties. In contrast, modern scientists view matter as composed of fundamental particles (atoms, subatomic particles) and focus on quantitative measurements and empirical evidence to describe matter's properties and behavior.
both aim to elicit viewer emotional response
I have no idea. Call a scientist or something I have no idea. Call a scientist or something
That his idea was really good that it became the american government. ;D YOUR VERY WELCOME! LOL
Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.
improvements of the idea
qw
i have no idea. ask a scientist.
from parents and school teachers
False
The scientist who first proposed the idea of the atom as a hard solid ball was John Dalton in the early 19th century. Dalton's atomic theory described atoms as tiny, indivisible particles that made up all matter.
The scientist who believed in an indivisible, uncuttable particle was Democritus. He proposed the concept of "atomos," which means indivisible, as the smallest unit of matter that cannot be further divided. This idea laid the foundation for the development of the modern atomic theory.