answersLogoWhite

0

Aristotle viewed matter as possessing inherent qualities and characteristics that determined its natural behavior, while scientists see matter as composed of fundamental particles with specific properties that interact based on physical laws and forces. Aristotle's view was more qualitative and subjective, while the scientific understanding is more quantitative and objective.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Physics

How did aristotles idea of matter differ from that of scientists?

Aristotle's idea of matter was based on a qualitative understanding where matter had inherent properties. In contrast, modern scientists view matter as composed of fundamental particles (atoms, subatomic particles) and focus on quantitative measurements and empirical evidence to describe matter's properties and behavior.


How did Aristotle's idea of matter differ from that of scientists?

Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.


Which scientist believed in an uncutable particle?

The scientist who believed in an indivisible, uncuttable particle was Democritus. He proposed the concept of "atomos," which means indivisible, as the smallest unit of matter that cannot be further divided. This idea laid the foundation for the development of the modern atomic theory.


How did Aristotle idea of matter differ from that of scientists?

Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and lacked empty spaces, while scientists today understand matter to be composed of atoms and molecules with spaces between them. Additionally, Aristotle viewed matter as having inherent qualities and tendencies, whereas modern science explains matter in terms of interactions between fundamental particles governed by physical laws.


What is the term for the false idea that the universe is nothing but matter in motion?

The term for the false idea that the universe is nothing but matter in motion is materialism. It is a philosophical belief that denies the existence of anything beyond physical matter and its interactions.

Related Questions

How did aristotles idea of matter differ from that of scientists?

Aristotle's idea of matter was based on a qualitative understanding where matter had inherent properties. In contrast, modern scientists view matter as composed of fundamental particles (atoms, subatomic particles) and focus on quantitative measurements and empirical evidence to describe matter's properties and behavior.


Why can Hellenistic sculpture be equated with Aristotles' idea of catharsis?

both aim to elicit viewer emotional response


Gas can be measured either by what?

I have no idea. Call a scientist or something I have no idea. Call a scientist or something


What conclusions can you draw about aristotles ideas about government?

That his idea was really good that it became the american government. ;D YOUR VERY WELCOME! LOL


How did Aristotle's idea of matter differ from that of scientists?

Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.


By evaluating and idea and disagreeing with it what do scientist encourage?

improvements of the idea


What is an example of the different ways a scientific idea can be interpreted by a scientist and a non-scientist?

qw


What is the meaning of chemical?

i have no idea. ask a scientist.


Where did you get the idea to be a scientist?

from parents and school teachers


What does a scientist call an idea that is not true?

False


The scientist who thought the atom was hard solid ball was?

The scientist who first proposed the idea of the atom as a hard solid ball was John Dalton in the early 19th century. Dalton's atomic theory described atoms as tiny, indivisible particles that made up all matter.


Which scientist believed in an uncutable particle?

The scientist who believed in an indivisible, uncuttable particle was Democritus. He proposed the concept of "atomos," which means indivisible, as the smallest unit of matter that cannot be further divided. This idea laid the foundation for the development of the modern atomic theory.