0
Aristotle's idea of matter was based on a qualitative understanding where matter had inherent properties. In contrast, modern scientists view matter as composed of fundamental particles (atoms, subatomic particles) and focus on quantitative measurements and empirical evidence to describe matter's properties and behavior.
What else can I help you with?
How did Aristotle's idea of matter differ from that of scientists?
Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.
How did Aristotle idea of matter differ from that of scientists?
Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and lacked empty spaces, while scientists today understand matter to be composed of atoms and molecules with spaces between them. Additionally, Aristotle viewed matter as having inherent qualities and tendencies, whereas modern science explains matter in terms of interactions between fundamental particles governed by physical laws.
How did Aristotle's idea of matter differ from that of scientist?
Aristotle viewed matter as possessing inherent qualities and characteristics that determined its natural behavior, while scientists see matter as composed of fundamental particles with specific properties that interact based on physical laws and forces. Aristotle's view was more qualitative and subjective, while the scientific understanding is more quantitative and objective.
What was the first said by scientists about atoms?
Early scientists speculated that the concept of atoms could explain the behavior of matter. The idea of atoms was proposed by ancient Greek philosophers such as Democritus around 400 BC, suggesting that matter is composed of indivisible particles. It wasn't until modern times that scientists were able to provide experimental evidence for the existence of atoms.
Could dark matter consist of black holes?
Dark matter is a mysterious substance that makes up a large portion of the universe's mass, but its exact nature is still unknown. While some theories suggest that dark matter could potentially be made up of black holes, this idea is not widely accepted among scientists. More research and evidence are needed to determine the true nature of dark matter.
How did Aristotle's idea of matter differ from that of scientists?
Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.
How does an emerging idea differ from scientific consensus?
An emerging idea has been examined by a large number of scientists.
How did Aristotle idea of matter differ from that of scientists?
Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and lacked empty spaces, while scientists today understand matter to be composed of atoms and molecules with spaces between them. Additionally, Aristotle viewed matter as having inherent qualities and tendencies, whereas modern science explains matter in terms of interactions between fundamental particles governed by physical laws.
Why can Hellenistic sculpture be equated with Aristotles' idea of catharsis?
both aim to elicit viewer emotional response
How did Aristotle's idea of matter differ from that of scientist?
Aristotle viewed matter as possessing inherent qualities and characteristics that determined its natural behavior, while scientists see matter as composed of fundamental particles with specific properties that interact based on physical laws and forces. Aristotle's view was more qualitative and subjective, while the scientific understanding is more quantitative and objective.
How did the early ideas about atoms Democritus and Aristotle discussed differ from the work of scientists that came later?
Democritus proposed that matter is made up of indivisible particles called atoms, which differ in shape and size. Aristotle, on the other hand, believed in four elements (earth, water, air, fire) and did not support the idea of indivisible particles. Later scientists built on Democritus's concept by discovering the structure of the atom, including subatomic particles and the existence of a nucleus.
What conclusions can you draw about aristotles ideas about government?
That his idea was really good that it became the american government. ;D YOUR VERY WELCOME! LOL
What was the first said by scientists about atoms?
Early scientists speculated that the concept of atoms could explain the behavior of matter. The idea of atoms was proposed by ancient Greek philosophers such as Democritus around 400 BC, suggesting that matter is composed of indivisible particles. It wasn't until modern times that scientists were able to provide experimental evidence for the existence of atoms.
What led scientists accepting mendel idea?
Scientists discovered chromosomes in DNA
When scientists evaluate an idea an disagree with it what do they sometimes do?
improvements of the idea
How many scientists works in NASA?
i have no idea no
Who developed the philosophical idea of an atom?
The idea of the atom was first proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus in the 5th century BCE. He suggested that all matter is made up of indivisible particles called atoms, which differ in size, shape, and arrangement.
