Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)
Brown, which dealt exclusively with segregation in public schools, set a precedent used to help end segregation in other public services and facilities. The Warren Court sent a strong message to both the state and federal judiciary about its position on segregation, which encouraged and presented an opportunity for lower court judges to overturn Jim Crow laws under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: let the decision stand). Not all judges applied the decision broadly, however. Those with biases favoring segregation still found ways to rationalize upholding certain discriminatory laws. Brown represented a turning-point in the Civil Rights Movement, but didn't single-handedly change judicial decision-making.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
judicial
yes it did
Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland was created in 2002.
it is not necessary to change the system of separate schools for children of different races
We must return the position of Commissioner of Education to an elected position; change the positions on the State School Board to an elected.
Scarborough Board of Education was created in 1954.
board of education
brown vs board of education
Haldimand Board of Education ended in 1996.
Norfolk Board of Education ended in 1996.
Scarborough Board of Education ended in 1998.
Central Board of Secondary Education