It is only a phantasy.
Fighting against thieves, assassins, drunk car drivers, etc.
Marin Preda died on May 16, 1980, in Bucharest, Romania of rumors that he was killed by Ceausescu's police.
Since Gorbachev finally allowed Eastern Countries to do what they wanted, Romania wanted to become democratic, but the leader, Nicolae Ceausescu wouldn't allow it. He was very harsh and strict with his people. Eventually riots began in the streets with people protesting for change. He then order his Securitate, secret police, to fire at the people and many people were killed, but that didn't stop them. They continued to demanded change and they turned very violent. ..... The revolution went on from there....
it is because lozer and police are jerks and nerds
Sexual Revolution
President Nicolae Ceaușescu responded to the calls for reform and independence in Romania with a mix of repression and rhetoric. Initially, he attempted to maintain control through a heavy-handed crackdown on protests and dissent, employing the secret police to suppress opposition. However, as the situation escalated, he also made superficial concessions, attempting to project an image of reform while ultimately clinging to power. This approach ultimately failed, leading to his overthrow in December 1989 during the Romanian Revolution.
The Romanian revolution was violent, and the Czech revolution was not.
The Romanian and Czech revolutions were distinct events that occurred in 1989, marking the end of communist rule in their respective countries. Here are the main differences between the two: Timing and Triggers: Romania: The Romanian Revolution began in December 1989, triggered by the government's attempts to suppress a protest in the city of Timișoara against the eviction of a Hungarian ethnic pastor. The protest escalated into a nationwide anti-government movement. Czechoslovakia (now Czech Republic and Slovakia): The Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia started in November 1989 after the police suppressed a peaceful student demonstration in Prague. The Velvet Revolution was largely non-violent and peaceful. Nature of the Revolutions: Romania: The Romanian Revolution was more violent and confrontational. It involved widespread protests, clashes with security forces, and ultimately, the overthrow and execution of the communist leader, Nicolae Ceaușescu, and his wife. Czechoslovakia: The Velvet Revolution was characterized by its non-violent nature. Protesters engaged in peaceful demonstrations, strikes, and acts of civil disobedience. The communist government eventually gave in to the demands of the protesters, leading to a peaceful transition of power. International Involvement: Romania: The international community had limited involvement in the Romanian Revolution. The overthrow of Ceaușescu's regime was primarily driven by internal factors. Czechoslovakia: The Velvet Revolution received significant international attention and support. Western countries, including the United States and European nations, expressed solidarity with the Czechoslovak people and pressured the communist government to allow democratic reforms. Aftermath: Romania: After the revolution, Romania faced a period of political instability and economic challenges. The country underwent significant political and economic reforms in the years that followed. Czechoslovakia: The Velvet Revolution led to the peaceful dissolution of the communist government. Czechoslovakia transitioned to a democratic system, and in 1993, the country peacefully split into two separate nations: the Czech Republic and Slovakia. These differences highlight the unique contexts and outcomes of the Romanian and Czech revolutions.
Vladamir Lenin, leader of the Bolsheviks.
sexual revolution ♥
Yes, as long as the felony does not contradict the romanian police records (a robbery is ok, but a terrorist attack is not)
The February Revolution (on Woman's Day in March) involved mass demonstrations and armed fights with police and the loyal forces of the Russian monarchy. Causes of the revolution were political and economic instability, technological backwardness and fundamental social divisions.