0
It did not change the way all empires were ruled, only the Persian Empire.
It led to a greater devolution of local power and incredible non-Persian loyalty and friendship among the conquered gentry. This allowed Cyrus to use royal funds to improve the empire as opposed to using it to constantly suppress minorities.
What else can I help you with?
How did cyrus's policy of toleration change the way empires were ruled?
It did not change the way all empires were ruled, only the Persian Empire. It led to a greater devolution of local power and incredible non-Persian loyalty and friendship among the conquered gentry. This allowed Cyrus to use royal funds to improve the empire as opposed to using it to constantly suppress minorities.
How did policy of toleration change the way empires were rules?
It did not change the way all empires were ruled, only the Persian Empire. It led to a greater devolution of local power and incredible non-Persian loyalty and friendship among the conquered gentry. This allowed Cyrus to use royal funds to improve the empire as opposed to using it to constantly suppress minorities.
How did Cyrus's policies of toleration change the way empires were ruled?
Cyrus brought about a positive and diplomatic approach that cut down greatly on the amount of internal conflict within an empire. As long as a conquered people paid the required tribute, Cyrus allowed them to have much of what they wanted. He showed toleration for their cultures and beliefs. They were allowed to worship their own God, practice their own beliefs and remain relatively free.
How were Cyrus's rules different from those of earlier empires?
He carried on the same techniques as the predecessor empires - Assyria and Babylon - after taking them over - he was not going to change a winning formula. Local government was retained, with oversight by Persian provincial governors, just as the others had done.
Which key figure is known for tolerating the customs of those he conquered?
Cyrus the great of Persia is the key figure of two traditions of toleration. He is known the Hebrew bible for letting the Jews return to Jerusalem and Xenophon which is policy of religious toleration.
How was Cyrus rule different from eariler empires?
Cyrus the Great's rule differed from earlier empires through his approach to governance and cultural tolerance. Unlike many conquerors who imposed their culture and beliefs, Cyrus respected the customs and religions of the peoples he conquered, allowing them to maintain their traditions. This policy of tolerance helped to unify his diverse empire and foster loyalty among his subjects. Additionally, Cyrus established a more organized administrative system, promoting infrastructure and trade, which contributed to the stability and prosperity of the Persian Empire.
What empires did Cyrus conquer?
Median Empire, Lydian Empire, Neo-Babylonian Empire
How did Cyrus style of government unify his empire?
policies of toleration, tribute, allow people to keep culture/religion, keep leaders, and etc.
How did Cyrus's style of governing unify his empire?
policies of toleration, tribute, allow people to keep culture/religion, keep leaders, and etc.
Why did the Persians have fewer revolts than earlier empires?
because cyrus the great was a fair king
What happened to Cyrus's empires after he died?
A fake descendant tried to take over but was dismissed by Cyrus' real son Cambyses, who extended the empire into North Africa.
How did Datis. The Persian king Cyrus the Great change history?
Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Achaemenid Empire, significantly changed history by uniting the Medes and Persians, establishing one of the largest empires in the ancient world. His policies of tolerance and respect for the cultures and religions of the lands he conquered, exemplified by the Cyrus Cylinder, laid the groundwork for future governance and administration. Additionally, his innovative approach to leadership and statecraft influenced subsequent empires and set a precedent for the concept of human rights. Cyrus's legacy endures in the historical narrative of leadership and empire-building.
