When the cotton gin was invented, slaves became incredibly valuable. This invention separated seeds from the white cottony fiber of the cotton, eliminating the need of slaves to do it. So the farmers could now grow more cotton, and to do this they needed more slaves. But at this time slave trade was abolished. So slaves became extremely expensive. From $600 to $1,800!So people started to 'breed' slaves, as a result of this.
The cotton gin made more slaves be needed in the South to pick the cotton for clothes which made slaves be great need to farmers in the South
The cotton gin actually increased the need for slaves. It could separate the cotton more than twice as fast, so they needed more slaves.
It made cotton production in the US more profitable, and ended up increasing the market for slaves. This drove up the value of slaves and ended up in more slavery.
The cotton gin made labor easy for people or slaves, so the cost decreases.
The southern economy was dependent on agriculture. The plantation owners used slaves to get the work done more quickly and because they didn't have to pay slaves because they are slaves. It did decline somewhat because cotton(the main staple product in the south) has seeds but picking them by hand was too slow and then the cotton would lose its value. Then slavery increased because an inventor named Eli Whitney made the cotton gin, a machine used to pick cotton seeds. Eli Whitney hoped his machine would help slavery decline but the opposite had happened. Since the cotton could have the seeds picked faster they needed more people to plant and harvest the cotton A.K.A. slaves.
chief value cotton
agriculture was the souths major economic value. due to the rich soil in the south, and the abundance of slaves in the south, cotton was very easy to grow, and was valuable to the north, which was based mainly on cities and factories, causing cotton th be a major driving force of the south.
Share croppers were at risk of non profit but slavery was for free so slave owners pick slaves rather than share croppers and the cotton the slaves pick were more of value so having someone for free
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servants.
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~
it increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servants
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~