answersLogoWhite

0

European firms were the leaders in high-performance asphalt, tunneling, high-speed rail work, and marine construction.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did Japanese construction firms lead the market?

Construction firms in Japan--the world's largest market at $700 billion in 1995--were the world leaders in the use of high-performance steel, automated equipment, and intelligent buildings and systems


When firms exit in a competitive market their exit will?

When firms exit a competitive market, their exit typically leads to a reduction in supply, which can increase the market price for the remaining firms. This adjustment may allow the surviving firms to become more profitable, as the decrease in competition can lead to higher prices for goods or services. Additionally, the exit of firms can signal to the remaining players that the market conditions may need to change, prompting them to innovate or improve efficiency. Overall, firm exits help restore equilibrium in the market.


What types of market structures in construction industry?

The construction industry typically exhibits characteristics of various market structures, including perfect competition, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. In areas with many small contractors and low barriers to entry, perfect competition can occur. Monopolistic competition is common where firms offer differentiated services, while oligopoly may be present in large-scale projects dominated by a few major firms. Additionally, public sector projects may lead to monopolistic situations when a single contractor is awarded exclusive contracts.


Which market model assumes the least number of firms in an industry?

The market model that assumes the least number of firms in an industry is the monopoly model. In a monopoly, a single firm dominates the market, controlling the entire supply of a product or service, which allows it to exert significant pricing power. This structure contrasts sharply with models like perfect competition or oligopoly, which involve multiple firms competing in the market. Consequently, monopolies can lead to less consumer choice and potential market inefficiencies.


How does collusion improve the financial standing of firms?

Collusion can improve the financial standing of firms by allowing them to work together to manipulate prices, reduce competition, and increase profits. This can lead to higher revenues and market power for the colluding firms, ultimately boosting their financial performance.


What exit of firms from market?

The exit of firms from a market occurs when businesses leave or cease operations due to various factors such as financial losses, increased competition, regulatory challenges, or changing consumer preferences. This process can lead to reduced supply in the market, potentially increasing prices for remaining firms. Additionally, firm exit can indicate underlying market issues, prompting remaining companies to adapt or innovate to survive. Ultimately, the exit can reshape the competitive landscape and influence market dynamics.


How do strategic complements impact decision-making in a competitive market environment?

Strategic complements in a competitive market environment refer to products or actions that become more valuable when other firms also adopt them. This can lead to a situation where firms are incentivized to make similar decisions to their competitors in order to stay competitive. This can impact decision-making by creating a tendency for firms to follow the actions of their competitors, leading to a more homogeneous market landscape.


Ceteris paribus a decrease in input costs to firms in a market will result in?

Ceteris paribus, a decrease in input costs for firms in a market will lead to an increase in supply. As firms incur lower production costs, they can produce more at each price level, shifting the supply curve to the right. This typically results in a lower equilibrium price and a higher equilibrium quantity in the market. Ultimately, consumers benefit from lower prices and greater availability of goods.


What would be identified by few firms selling identical or similar products?

When few firms sell identical or similar products, it typically indicates a market characterized by oligopoly or monopolistic competition. In such markets, firms may compete on factors beyond price, such as branding, customer service, or product differentiation. This scenario can lead to limited consumer choice and potential price collusion among firms, impacting overall market dynamics. Additionally, barriers to entry may prevent new competitors from entering the market easily.


What is an oligopoly and what effect did it have on business?

An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of firms that dominate an industry, leading to limited competition. This concentration allows these firms to influence prices and market conditions, often resulting in higher prices for consumers and reduced innovation. Firms in an oligopoly may engage in collusion or tacit agreements to maintain market control, which can stifle competition and lead to inefficiencies in the market. Overall, the presence of an oligopoly can significantly impact business strategies, pricing, and consumer choices.


What is the role of firms in a free market?

In a free market, firms play a crucial role by producing goods and services that meet consumer demands. They compete with one another to innovate and improve efficiency, which can lead to better quality products and lower prices. Additionally, firms contribute to economic growth by creating jobs and generating wealth, while responding to market signals to allocate resources effectively. Overall, they are key drivers of economic activity and consumer choice in a free market system.


How are inefficient firms affected by the reduction in trade restrictions among countries and the continuous increase in international trade?

Inefficient firms face increased competition from more efficient international competitors when trade restrictions are reduced. This heightened competition can lead to a loss of market share, forcing inefficient firms to either innovate, improve their productivity, or reduce costs to survive. If they fail to adapt, these firms may face declining profits or even exit the market altogether. Ultimately, the pressure from international trade can drive overall market efficiency by encouraging less competitive firms to either improve or leave.