Collusion can improve the financial standing of firms by allowing them to work together to manipulate prices, reduce competition, and increase profits. This can lead to higher revenues and market power for the colluding firms, ultimately boosting their financial performance.
Collusion between two firms occurs when they secretly work together to manipulate the market in their favor, such as by fixing prices or limiting competition.
collusion
collusion
Tacit collusion
Shared or Joint monopoly refers to anticompetitive behaviour by firms, normally an oligopoly, in order to secure monopoly profits for the firms as a group. Essentially, shared monopoly requires some form of collusion but stops short of being a formal cartel. It is therefore similar to tacit collusion. In a shared monopoly firms may not compete for the same customers and have instead local monopolies.
Collusion between two firms occurs when they secretly work together to manipulate the market in their favor, such as by fixing prices or limiting competition.
Collusion among firms typically results in higher prices and reduced output levels compared to the competitive equilibrium. This can lead to market inefficiency and consumer welfare losses as prices are artificially inflated. Collusion can also create barriers to entry for new firms and reduce innovation in the market.
Overt collusion is where firms in an oligopoly formally set a price together, (usually high to maximize profits). This is usually done in secret because its illegal in most countries, but the main characteristic is that it is formal. I believe overt collusion is where on firm in an oligopoly reacts to a price drop in another firms from that oligopoly. For instance a competing firm drops there price from £1 to 50p, the other firms will have to otherwise they will lose profits, allthoufh this is bad for all firms because everybody loses potential profits. Am still researching this though so not 100% on overt collusion.
collusion
collusion
Tacit collusion
It is false.It means when firms explicitly agree to co-operate rather than compete.
Shared or Joint monopoly refers to anticompetitive behaviour by firms, normally an oligopoly, in order to secure monopoly profits for the firms as a group. Essentially, shared monopoly requires some form of collusion but stops short of being a formal cartel. It is therefore similar to tacit collusion. In a shared monopoly firms may not compete for the same customers and have instead local monopolies.
Price fixing can only be collusion if it happens due to all the firms in an oligopoly system come together to decide the price. Price fixing can also be implemented by government (especially in agriculture sector), in which case is not considered a collusion.
Partial collusion refers to a situation where two or more parties coordinate their actions to achieve mutual benefits while still competing in certain aspects of their business. Unlike full collusion, where companies agree to eliminate competition entirely, partial collusion allows for some degree of rivalry, such as maintaining competitive pricing in specific markets while collaborating in others. This strategy can help firms maximize profits while reducing the risks of legal repercussions associated with outright collusion.
Generally, collusion occurs when participating firms can increase their short-run economic profits by controlling supply, acting like a monopoly.
To see the Firms Financial position Firms Performance Trend analysis