answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Galieo was the first scientist to study the night sky systematically with a telescope. One of the things he discovered was the phases of Venus, which had not been seen before.

In a telescope Venus looks like a crescent when it passes between the Earth and Sun, for a few weeks either side of its closest approach to Earth, called inferior conjunction, when it is invisible (in line with the Sun approximately). That was consistent with the old geocentric theory that placed the Earth at the centre of everything.

Galileo also discovered that when Venus is near its furthest point, superior conjunction, it shows a gibbous phase (like the Moon between half-moon and full moon). That is not explained by the geocentric theory called the Ptolemaic system, that had lasted for 1500 years, because it shows that Venus in this part of its orbit is further away from us than the Sun, which is impossible in the Ptolemaic system.

Galileo used this as a proof of Copernicus's heliocentric theory, but he was mistaken in this because Tycho Brahe had produced a geocentric theory that still had the Earth at the centre, but allowed Venus to pass behind the Sun (as seen from Earth).

It needed many further discoveries after the time of Galileo to make people realise that the heliocentric concept is the correct one. The modern system uses Kepler's model. Kepler used the Copernican idea of having the Sun at the centre, but threw out the circles and epicycles of the Copernican theory. In the modern theory based on Kepler's laws, each planet is in an elliptical orbit with the Sun occupying one focus.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did Galileo's observation provide evidence against the previous hypothesis?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What features on the surface of mars or the moon indicate possible previous existence of liquid water?

evidence of ice.


Example of a hypothesis in an investigatory project?

Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[1] A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.[2]Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses. These steps must be repeatable in order to dependably predict any future results. Theories that encompass wider domains of inquiry may bind many independently-derived hypotheses together in a coherent, supportive structure. This in turn may help form new hypotheses or place groups of hypotheses into context.Among other facets shared by the various fields of inquiry is the conviction that the process be objective to reduce biased interpretations of the results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, thereby allowing other researchers the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them.


How evidence based practice has influenced work with children in their early years?

Evidence-based practice can be described as "a framework of decisions that are made from previous knowledge that are derived from previous research" (University of Westminster, 2008). It is influenced by objective evidence derived from research and allows practitioners to apply their knowledge to a situation that has been previously researched which allows them to make a well informed decision about future action(s). My everyday practice is influenced by what I have found out or learnt previously either from college, media, previous working experiences, books, colleagues, etc and professional practice requires these findings and research should be kept up-to-date and practiced if applicable. Sometimes, we need to be sure of what we find out before taking action as it might not be real or true. A example of how research has influenced work with children is The Effective Provision of Pre-School Education (EPPE) which is the first major European longitudinal study in the UK to focus on the effectiveness of early years education and a study of a national sample of young children's development (intellectual and social/behavioural) between ages 3-7. EPPE collected a wide range of information on more than 3000children, their parents, their home environment and the pre-school they attended. Its findings found that children who had attended early years provision were more likely to have better cognitive, social and behaviour skills when they started formal education than those who had no early years provision. EPPE also confirmed the value of early learning through 'play' especially from low-income families. Key Elements of effective practice (KEEP) is another example. It emphasises that effective learning in children is dependent on secure relationships. Learning through play and forming secure relationships are both key elements to the EYFS. When observation schedules and routines (formal and non-formal observation), reflective practice, are done, there is quality and accountability in the practice, staff may require training and review of procedures and/or policies in order to keep up to date with new evidence in the provision of health and educational provision (this may be evidence -based planning).


What was cushelle's previous name?

Charmin


Which of the following tissues plays an important role in supporting the plant stemEpidermis PhloemCambium None of the previous tissues?

None of the previous tissues.

Related questions

What are most hypothesis based?

Previous observation, instinct of the scientists, or just pure guess.


Make a sentence using hypothesis?

due to my previous findings my hypothesis was wrong


What is a hypothesis?

A hypothesis is a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth. It is an unproved theory or conjecture that may be the basis for experimentation.


What is meant by empirical evidence?

Empirical evidence is an observed phenomenon that appears the same to all observers. In science, evidence is never "proven true," nor is any hypothesis or theory. Scientific information is only considered valid until further evidence is observed that contradicts the hypothesis, theory, or interpretation of previous evidence. Therefore, the concept of proof is not a part of science. It is a valid concept in mathematics and law, but not science in its strictest sense. This reliance on empirical evidence is one of several measures that maintain science as a self-correcting means of studying and learning.


What are the good characteristic of a hypothesis?

A good research hypothesis must first, and most importantly, have a testable hypothesis. The hypothesis should be stated, it is not a question. It should be brief and to the point. Finally, there should some previous research that should be used to help form the hypothesis.


What are the characteristics of a good research hypothesis?

A good research hypothesis must first, and most importantly, have a testable hypothesis. The hypothesis should be stated, it is not a question. It should be brief and to the point. Finally, there should some previous research that should be used to help form the hypothesis.


What are 3 sources from which a hypothesis may arise?

Invariably, they arise out of a curious mind. People make observations and notice what might be subtle patterns in the information, or they think about a problem in one field by playing with ideas from another field, or a thought comes after struggling with a problem for a long time. They can arise in any number of ways; but they all have curious minds as their means of expression.


What is a testable explanation for a question that is a best guess hased upon your previous knowledge?

hypothesis


What is a testable explanation for a question that is best guess based upon your previous knowledge?

Hypothesis.


What do you need in a science conclusion?

An answer to your hypothesis supported by your experiment and data from previous experiment's about the same idea


A testable explanation for a question that is a best guess based upon your previous knowledge?

A testable explanation for a question that is based upon previous knowledge is known as a scientific hypothesis. This explanation can then be tested using the scientific method.


What can new observation have on a scientific theory?

If new observations are discovered that clash with the previous theory, then the theory will have to be revised.