Want this question answered?
He was much too cautious - not willing to move until everything was ready. He was also badly misled about enemy srength - he listened to Allan Pinkerton, who vastly over-rated these troop-numbers.
I don't know the exact answer BUT I do know of four answers that will lower it down for you a lot. Why? Because two of them are the answer! Answer 1: He proved incapable of leading an inferior army. Answer 2: He always fought with Lincoln over policies. Answer 3: He was overly cautious as battles neared. Answer 4: He always believed he was outnumbered. I know your thinking, why don't I just give you the answer, that's what this site is for?! The answer to that is, because I do not know the answer, I am in school and have a multiple choice question. Those answers were the four answers I had to choose from, and 2 of them are correct. Hope it help's at least a little.
He was not replaced. Lincoln as Commander in Chief and his "war board" acted as the military's Supreme Command.That is wrongeHe did get replaced by PopeCorrect - He was replaced by Pope, who was not the first choice but the only available choice. Lincoln and his war cabinet retained control over the plans of Pope for a brief time since they were nervous about the general failure of any general they had available to prosecute the war effectively. They finally gave in to bringing McClellan back after Pope proved worse than useless at 2d Manassas. Pope was sent to Minnesota to fight the Souix.
Joe Hooker. He had shown great qualities, both as a fighting leader and as an organiser. But the Lee-Jackson team proved too much for him. They managed to wrong-foot him and he lost his nerve.
The local "ras" (oddly, an Ethiopian title of nobilty). Many proved too nutty even for the Fascist leadership, which takes some doing.
He was much too cautious - not willing to move until everything was ready. He was also badly misled about enemy srength - he listened to Allan Pinkerton, who vastly over-rated these troop-numbers.
I don't know the exact answer BUT I do know of four answers that will lower it down for you a lot. Why? Because two of them are the answer! Answer 1: He proved incapable of leading an inferior army. Answer 2: He always fought with Lincoln over policies. Answer 3: He was overly cautious as battles neared. Answer 4: He always believed he was outnumbered. I know your thinking, why don't I just give you the answer, that's what this site is for?! The answer to that is, because I do not know the answer, I am in school and have a multiple choice question. Those answers were the four answers I had to choose from, and 2 of them are correct. Hope it help's at least a little.
President Lincoln sent his newly appointed General in Chief Henry Wager Halleck to visit General McClellan at his headquarters on the Peninsula in July of 1862. McClellan refused to take the a second offensive against Richmond unless he was reinforced. Halleck immediately saw the Union's disadvantage in this situation. Unless Confederate General Lee perceived McClellan as a threat to Richmond, he would be free to use his interior lines to attack either McClellan or the new army in Virginia under the command of General Pope. Halleck's decision proved to be eventful. He ordered McClellan to leave the Peninsula and reinforce Pope in northern Virginia.
As a war leader Jefferson Davis was proved incapable of handling the Confederacy's home front problems. He was the President of the confederate states from 1861 until 1865.
General George B. McClellan was an excellent commander when it came to building and properly organizing troops. He displayed that when US President Lincoln summoned him to Washington DC in the Summer of 1861. McClellan was also a great military strategist. He made superb operational and battle strategies. His problems were over estimating the size of armies of the South he had to face and always asking for more troops. He mistakenly relied all too often on Allan Pinkerton to gage for him the troop strength of the Confederates. He was reluctant to march into battle unless he believed he had an overwhelming advantage. Additionally, he and US President Lincoln differed on the way to conduct the war. This eventually led to his battlefield career. He was dismissed from commanding the Army of the Potomac in November of 862 and was transferred to Trenton, NJ.
he was gelable, kiddish, he would take the last person's opinion, he was really mean and he was not interested in his marriage.
In general a contradiction cannot be proved.
Although General in Chief McClellan proved to be lacking as a battlefield commander, few can doubt that he was a brilliant strategist. He wanted to take Texas out of the Confederacy as soon as possible. McClellan planned to have the new commander in the Department of Kansas to play a major role in attacking Texas. He had placed Major General David Hunter in charge of the new department. McClellan's plans called for Hunter to move into the Indian Territory west of Arkansas and from there move into northern Texas. This would be a two pronged attack in conjunction with an offensive against Texas from the Gulf of Mexico. General Hunter was willing to execute such a plan but advised his new superior officer that he would need at least 20,000 troops to begin any actions against Texas. This plan was placed on hold as McClellan was distracted with important plans for Virginia.
The best water way route to reach Richmond was being able for General George B. McClellan to use the York River. The problem he confronted was that Confederate artillery batteries blocked the way. Although originally these batteries seemed be weak, McClellan chose to put Yorktown under siege. The Confederate defensive positions proved, however, to be more effective than even generals Johnston and Lee expected. The Confederate commander at Yorktown was John B. Magruder.
General George B. McClellan was best known for his thorough planning and attention to the details of his army, but this quality also served as a double-edged sword in that he would often overestimate the strength of his enemy. This proved costly in battles such as Antietam, in which while technically winning due to Robert E. Lee's retreat, his hesitation in deploying his reserves to capitalize on the local successes throughout the battle would ultimately allow General Lee to escape with a large portion of his force intact. McClellan's giving in to caution and refusing to pursue Lee following the battle ultimately led to his removal by President Lincoln, and his replacement by General Ambrose Burnside.
Grant
He was not replaced. Lincoln as Commander in Chief and his "war board" acted as the military's Supreme Command.That is wrongeHe did get replaced by PopeCorrect - He was replaced by Pope, who was not the first choice but the only available choice. Lincoln and his war cabinet retained control over the plans of Pope for a brief time since they were nervous about the general failure of any general they had available to prosecute the war effectively. They finally gave in to bringing McClellan back after Pope proved worse than useless at 2d Manassas. Pope was sent to Minnesota to fight the Souix.