Julius Caesar was tremendously popular with the middle and lower classes of Rome. This was because he was a popularis. The populares (plural) were a political faction which championed the cause of the poor and tried to introduce reforms to help them. It was opposed by the optimates, a conservative political faction which favoured the aristocracy and opposed reforms. The power base of the optimates was the senate. The optimates were unpopular with the masses because they opposed reform and were the representatives of an aristocracy which was seen as corrupt. Caesar was seen as the hero of ordinary people and the poor. To them he stood up to the senate. Caesar implemented an agrarian reform which redistributed land to the poor. He issued a debt restructuring law, which eliminated about a fourth of all debts owed. He abolished a corrupt tax system which tendered tax collection to private individuals who "farmed" tax collection to line their pockets. He reverted to an earlier system which allowed cites to collect the taxes themselves. He gave greater legal rights to the conquered peoples. He also donated money to the poor.
Vercingetorix was a chieftain of the Arverni tribe; he united the Gauls in a revolt against Roman forces during the last phase of Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars. Caesar won and brutally killed most of them, conquering the country.
other peopr have diffrent opinons. some people think that he treated his soldiers good but some people think he treated them ot nicely. it all depends on which book u read.
Julius Caesar was known for his leniency and his clemency towards his defeated enemies.
he killed them with kindness... lol
Julius Caesar was famous for his leniency. He pardoned his opponents he defeated in battle.
This question is too vague to be answered in any reasonably brief manner. Caesar would have treated conquered people of the Empire differently from Romans. He would have treated loyal people different from rebellious ones. He would have treated plebians differently from nobles. What does the author really mean? George Ilio likes men
ffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
At first, they treated them with fairness but much more crule as the empire went on.
He was a just king but his assistants made bad assessments in a few occasions. When he was convinced of their bad assessments, he threw them in the lions den. If you want good information on the topic, the best place is the Catholic version of the book of Daniel.
Julius Caesar was famous for his leniency. He pardoned his opponents he defeated in battle.
This question is too vague to be answered in any reasonably brief manner. Caesar would have treated conquered people of the Empire differently from Romans. He would have treated loyal people different from rebellious ones. He would have treated plebians differently from nobles. What does the author really mean? George Ilio likes men
by licking penis
they had a tradition called the heistene where all the conquered people would get feces thrown in their face
how did jdye hehd
The Incas treated the people they conquered by having more emphasis on having those people become loyal Inca subjects.
It attempted to give them peace, prosperity and good government.
Rome treated conquered people generously. The knew the people would be more loyal to the government if treated like Romans.
Bad, but if they are nice, they treat it nicely (but they won't).
ffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
He forced many people to move from their homes to faraway lands trying to end the rebellion against him.
They would exile the people they conquered and make them slaves. They basically ruled them with an iron fist.