Want this question answered?
Louis Riel did not kill Thomas Scott. --------------------------------- Riel's government had Scott tried for defying the governments authority. Five of the seven members of the court, lead by Lieutenant A. Lapine, voted for the execution. Another government, from far away, representing other people, acted on their authority and traveled to the West and killed Riel. It was that government that gave us the narrative that Riel killed Scott. The reasons for Scotts execution, as for Riel's are many. Scott was violent and challenging the validity of the government selected by local people. He was also threatening life's and had already escaped and make it clear that should he be released or escape again he would kill many people, particularly Catholic people no doubt. Fear was part of the reason, and it was important that people respect the legitimate government of the people.
Louis XVI DID make serious mistakes, such as refusing to give the third Estate any say in how the moneys he asked from them would be spent. It was a reasonable request, given the many decades of financial mismanagement by the King's ministers. The second mistake was making a run for the armies who would protect him - but who were at the time France's enemies, invading France and fighting its armies - when he was placed under protective custody; and then organizing his flight so badly that he was quickly captured and brought back. The flight branded him a 'traitor to France' which led to his imprisonment and later, to his conviction to the guillotine. This happened at the start of the period in the French Revolution that came to be named The Terror. During that period thousands of noblemen and their families were executed, and chances are that the Terror's leader Robespierre might have targeted Louis for execution regardless of what had happened before. On the other hand, Louis XVI was not responsible for the armies of Austria invading France and its General's badly-chosen wording in his 'demand' that Louis be reinstated in all his powers, and branding the French as no more than a bunch of rebels. Nor can he on the basis of his treatment by the revolutionaries so far, really be blamed for fearing for his family's life and safety and wanting to run. But had Louis immediately granted a say of the Third Estate in the way the money he asked them for would be spent, he might well have prevented his downfall and have ruled on as a constitutional monarch. In that way he would also have prevented the invasion of France by Austria. So on consideration, Louis' own clumsy handling of the situation probably was a bigger factor than any organized movement to bring him down instead of the other way around.
Uhh...actually, Reagan prolonged the life of it. Carter realized the Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse so he was willing to wait them out. Reagan decided to outspend them and in doing so revitalized the USSR. They eventually collapsed, but if Carter had won reelection it would happened by 1983.
Uhh...actually, Reagan prolonged the life of it. Carter realized the Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse so he was willing to wait them out. Reagan decided to outspend them and in doing so revitalized the USSR. They eventually collapsed, but if Carter had won reelection it would happened by 1983.
No branch serves for life. Some officers and officials serve for life. For example, federal judges serve for life.
louis tomlensin is a singer . louis tomlensin is 20 years old. louis tomlensin is on one dirction
The most tragic aspect of Louis Riel's life is that he was convicted of treason and was executed by the Canadian government.
He risked his life to save the metis, he knew he was going to dei but he still fought
his beliefs where your face
Animal life in Manitoba
Peter Charlebois is the author of "The Chain of Kindness: Serving Kindness One Link at a Time," a book that explores the power of kindness in everyday life. He is also known for his work as a motivational speaker and advocate for spreading kindness and positivity.
Depending on where you live in Manitoba, life can be pretty boring, or the same as everywhere else.
Louis Riel did not kill Thomas Scott. --------------------------------- Riel's government had Scott tried for defying the governments authority. Five of the seven members of the court, lead by Lieutenant A. Lapine, voted for the execution. Another government, from far away, representing other people, acted on their authority and traveled to the West and killed Riel. It was that government that gave us the narrative that Riel killed Scott. The reasons for Scotts execution, as for Riel's are many. Scott was violent and challenging the validity of the government selected by local people. He was also threatening life's and had already escaped and make it clear that should he be released or escape again he would kill many people, particularly Catholic people no doubt. Fear was part of the reason, and it was important that people respect the legitimate government of the people.
Standing up to Canada, taking a leadership role in negotiations and the defense of those living in the lands bought by Canada was very risky and eventually ended up being fatal.
Dorothy Vipond has written: 'Proudly we speak' -- subject(s): Frontier and pioneer life, History, Manitoba, Manitoba Woodworth, Woodworth, Woodworth, Manitoba
Louis riel was a traitor because: 1. He executed Thomas Scott 2. he fled to the USA when the Metis needed him most 3. he rebelled against the government illegally. 4. he betrayed his country after the rebellion failed. 5. he almost destroyed the Metis community 6. he went crazy - with religion and the Metis community. 7. he expected that everyone would listen to him. Those are some reasons Louis Riel was a traitor.
i mean "bring me to life" by evanescence