Robert Hooke Discovered the cell in 1665
Yes. Robert Hooke saw cells in cork when he observed it under the microscope. What he actually observed was the cell walls of dead cork cells. He called them cells because they reminded him of the rooms (cells) of monks in a monastery.
Robert Hooke fave this name to the cells he saw in a piece of cork becuse the reminded him of the cells that monks live in. They, like many plant cells, were square. If he had seen an animal cell the name may have not been " cell. "
The cells that were first seen were nonliving.
Hooke's discovery dealt with cells, which are extremely tiny that it is impossible to be seen with the naked eye. So, without the microscope, he would not have been able to see it.
Cells.
The first seen cells were non-living and they were found by Robert Hooke in a sample of cork.
Viruses are too small, and can't be seen in an optic microscope.
Hooke looked at a slice of cork and saw that it look like a cell where monks and nuns used to sleep.
Robert hooke
Robert Hooke Discovered the cell in 1665
The first seen cell was non-living. It was founded by Robert Hooke in 1665 in a piece of cork.
Cork cells from plants were first observed under a microscope by Robert Hooke.
he was taunting Robert hooke
Yes. Robert Hooke saw cells in cork when he observed it under the microscope. What he actually observed was the cell walls of dead cork cells. He called them cells because they reminded him of the rooms (cells) of monks in a monastery.
The answer is that over the many years they have discovered clearer more zooming things.
Yes. He himself told one of his main rivals, Robert Hooke, "if I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants".