0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the Romans know people were Christians?
The Romans would require sacrifices to their pagan gods by their citizens. If a citizen refused, then it was assumed that the person was a Christian, or possibly Jewish.
Is an emperor the ruler of an empire?
Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.
How slaves for Roman becamecitizens?
No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.
Did the Romans consider Cincinnatus a hero?
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (519 BC - 430 BC) was a Roman patrician (aristocrat) who had been impoverished by having to pay a huge fine for his son. He had to sell most of his land to pay for this. He then retired to work on the land he had left, which was only a small farm just outside Rome. He was appointed dictator in 458 BC to lead the Roman army against Aequi. He was told this while he was ploughing his land. He defeated the Aequi at the Battle of Mons Algidus. After this, he disbanded his army, resigned, and returned to his plough. His resignation was nothing exceptional. Dictators were supposed to resign when they completed their mandated task. Cincinnatus' leaving the plough and returning to it was mythologised by Roman historians. To them this epitomised the ideals of the Roman aristocracy who liked to see the Romans as frugal, hardy, dutiful and upright farmers. Cincinnatus was seen as a perfect case of service to the greater good, civic virtue, lack of personal ambition, modesty and Roman gravitas and was seen as an indication of the rectitude of the older days as compared to the perceived decadence and corruption of the later days when Roman historians were writing their histories.
Why were Romans put in the colosseum?
Romans were spectators at the Colosseum. In a few instances they would perform in some equestrian event or religious ceremony. However most of the entertainers who appeared in the Colosseum were hired people, acrobats, jugglers, animal trainers, gladiators and non-citizen criminals who were executed.
How do you define yourself as a citizen of the world?
To define yourself as a citizen of the world,that means to help out in community projects.
What is civis for Romans?
Civis is the Latin word for citizen. For Romans, the word incorporated all the honors, rights and duties of a Roman citizen.
Define the terms Augustus and Princeps?
Augustus - Venerable. Princeps - First Citizen.
First witch to be born?
That depends how you define a witch. The Romans and the Ancient Greeks had words for witches.
How did the Romans know people were Christians?
The Romans would require sacrifices to their pagan gods by their citizens. If a citizen refused, then it was assumed that the person was a Christian, or possibly Jewish.
What were some of the rights that citizen under roman law?
There is a link below to a description of rights of Romans.
How do you define your own nationality if your mother is French father British and you were born in the UK?
You would be a Britishh citizen
How would you define immagrant?
An immigrant is a person entering a country with the intention of settling in that country who is not a citizen of that country.
What kinds of food would roman citizen eat?
Lot's Of Romans Eat Meat From Markets And Some Sort Of Seed <?> I am only young and doing a project of The Romans. ;-)
How were people discriminated during Christ?
The Romans were not very discriminatory, either you were a citizen (with the benefits and duties that it involved) or you were not.
Is an emperor the ruler of an empire?
Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.
How slaves for Roman becamecitizens?
No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.
