Want this question answered?
The central government did not provide troops to quell the rebellion.
Before Shay's Rebellion, only congress could call the army into action. When Shay's Rebellion began, congress was not in session. No one had the authority to do anything. A movement arose to change the constitution so someone had the authority to act when congress was not in session. The new constitution made the President the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. He would be on duty when Congress was not in session. If a rebellion happened, he would be able to act.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
The price of a weak central government is anarchy.
The false statement is that the central government provided troops to quell the rebellion. The Shay Rebellion took place in Massachusetts in 1786.
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't
The continental congress's plan for a central government is called Articles of Confederation. This is part of the government.
congress
The price of a weak central government is anarchy.
Daniel shays
Although the Second Continental Congress had take on the functions of a central government, it really had no power to do so. The only thing that made Congress a central government was the fact that the necessities of war gave its decisions popular support.