0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If all woolies are tollies and all tollies are wamples then a wamples are definitely a woolies?
Absolutely
If all woolies are tollies are wamples then all wamples are defiently woolies is this true or false?
TRUE
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then are all Wamples definitely Woolies?
Logically yes
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then all Wamples are definitely Woolies True or False?
False. All Woolies might be tollies but that doesn't mean that all tollies are necessarily woolies. Nor are all wamples necessarily tollies. So the answer is definitely false.
Are all wamples woolies?
no
What are the woolies Howrse?
The chaps
How does Eurylochus convince the men to kill the cattle?
Eurylochus convinces the men that the gods will be appeased if they sacrifice some of the cattle to them.
What insect made cattle feel unwelcome at cattle drives?
The tick.
Looking at a standard wall-clock at the time 630 Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then all Wamples are definitely Woolies?
Obviously NO!
What do dwarf trees grow?
terry woolies
Where can I buy Jaguar deodorant in stores?
at woolies
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then can we say all Wamples are definitely Woolies?
No. Although the statements W ---> T, T ---> A (Woolies, Tollies and wAmples) by transitivity lead to the statement W ---> A, the statement A ---> W cannot be derived from this, because of the rules of logic, without further information on the population of Wamples. What this means is that even though all Woolies are Wamples, not all Wamples may be Woolies and we cannot define either way without more information . If this further information was found and showed that all wamples are indeed woolies, then we could write both statements of A ---> W and W A.
