i am not sure
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
Alfred Wegener's theory was rejected because he could not prove how the continents actually moved. He showed evidence of fossils from Africa and South America, but still coul not prove the convection surrents going on underground. Other geologists did not believe in his theory just because he was a meteorologist, not a geologist like themselves.
Because , firstly, he was an outsider. He had no proof. His theory that centrifugal force from Earth's rotation caused the drifting was proved to not have enough force to move continents, nor could he explain how continents moved through the sea floor. They had other theories about it (they were wrong of course) Seeing as it was 1916 and he was German they might not have trusted him (WW1) He had no backing. They thought you could not use geology to interpret the past.
Alfred's hypothesis was that all the continents were a big land mass which he called Pangaea because if you see a world map it is like a jigsaw puzzle and other evidence is that some animal fossils were on other continents. Also the same rock range was found on different continents.
Alfred Wegener's theory was rejected because he could not prove how the continents actually moved. He showed evidence of fossils from Africa and South America, but still coul not prove the convection surrents going on underground. Other geologists did not believe in his theory just because he was a meteorologist, not a geologist like themselves.
Only one other scientist at the time had the theory of evolution worked out and his name was Alfred Russell Wallace who wrote a book at the same time.
Alfred's hypothesis was that all the continents was a big land mass which he called Pangaea because if you see a world map it is like a jigsaw puzzle and other evidence is that some animal fossils were on other continents and also the same rock range was found on different continents. This hypothesis is known as continental drift.
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
Other scientists did not believe Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a plausible mechanism for how continents could move through the oceanic crust. Additionally, Wegener's evidence supporting his idea was largely based on geological and fossil similarities between continents, which were not considered strong enough to support such a revolutionary idea at the time. It wasn't until the mid-20th century, with the development of the theory of plate tectonics, that Wegener's hypothesis gained widespread acceptance.
Other scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of a supercontinent that broke apart, known as "continental drift," because Wegener did not provide a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, his hypothesis was seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained more widespread acceptance.
Alfred Wegener proposed his theory of continental drift through publications, such as his book "The Origin of Continents and Oceans" in 1915. He presented his ideas at scientific conferences and engaged in discussions with other geologists to promote his theory, despite facing initial skepticism from the scientific community. Wegener's theory gained more widespread acceptance after his death.