Alfred Wegener's theory was rejected because he could not prove how the continents actually moved. He showed evidence of fossils from Africa and South America, but still coul not prove the convection surrents going on underground.
Other geologists did not believe in his theory just because he was a meteorologist, not a geologist like themselves.
His evidence was incorrect.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
no because then they would know least about the world
A hypothesis will be rejected if it fails the necessary testing required for it to become a scientific theory.
The scientific means for proving his hypothesis had not yet been developed.
dont ask me freak
The answer to the question why is this: It can be rejected at a later date because it is falsifiable in nature if it is a good hypothesis. If you meant to ask HOW it can be rejected, the answer is by way of further experimentation that rules out some or all of the hypothesis as stated.
The hypothesis test.
no. you need to have solid proof that it exist.. else it will be rejected.
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.