0
How did people who were social darwinists darwinists surtify imperialism?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did people who were social Darwinists justify imperialism?
They accepted that we had to push out people who were standing in our way.
How did people were social darwinists justify imprializm?
Social Darwinists justified imperialism by arguing that it was the natural result of the struggle for existence and survival of the fittest. They believed that more advanced nations had a duty to conquer and civilize less advanced societies for their own benefit. This belief system provided a moral justification for exploiting and dominating other nations.
Why did social darwinists favor western imperialism?
idk but it think its because westerners thought they had a duty to bring their civilization to inferior races
What was social Darwinists?
Social Darwinists were people who applied Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human society. They believed that competition in society would lead to the survival of the fittest and that this should be applied to social and economic policies. This ideology was used to justify inequalities and oppression in society.
Who believed that society was a competition in which the fittest came out on top which justified the inequality faced by immigrants and minorities during the Gilded Age?
social Darwinist's
How did people who were darwinists justify imperialism?
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.All in all, according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
What did Social Darwinists believe?
Social Darwinists believed that individuals and societies competed in a struggle for existence, where only the fittest would survive and prosper. They applied Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human societies, arguing that government intervention in social and economic affairs would interfere with this natural process and hinder progress. This belief system justified practices such as laissez-faire capitalism and imperialism.
Why did Social Darwinists believe that imperialism was a good idea?
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.All in all, according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
How did social Darwinists view the poor?
Social Darwinists viewed the poor as being at the bottom of the social hierarchy due to their perceived lack of fitness and ability to compete successfully in society. They believed that poverty was a result of natural selection and survival of the fittest, and therefore saw little value in helping or supporting the poor.
Social darwinists believed that?
Social Darwinists believed that society should operate based on natural selection principles, with the fittest individuals or groups rising to the top. They argued that competition and inequality were necessary for progress and that government intervention in social and economic affairs was detrimental to the natural order.
What did Social Darwinists believe and how did it shape the reform movement in America?
Social Darwinists applied Charles Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection. They believed that the weaker members of society were as they were not because of their environment, but because they were lazy, unfit people, that wanted nothing more than to bring down the rest. During the popularization of Social Darwinism, those that were considered "superior," were those of high standing, of much influence, or of wealth. The lower and middle masses, were considered weak, and through the Social Darwinist view, things that society was better off with. This was pervaded by Horatio Alger stories and the belief that if they wished, people of lower classes could rise to fame and glory. Many Social Darwinists were also advocates of eugenics, and it is through the Social Darwinist philosophy, that the US Eugenics Movement came about in the 1960s. In terms of reform, Social Darwinism did little to help. If anything, it inhibited the efforts of many Progressives. While Progressives vied for social reform, Social Darwinists were content to leave things as they were. They believed that if things were left to their own accord, natural selection would take place, and the weaker members of society would be replaced by stronger, more able members. Eventually The Progressive Movement gained more support among the public, and reforms created despite the obstacles set by Social Darwinists.
Which statement would social darwinists mmost likely support?
Stronger groups have the right to rule and control weaker groups.
