Some philosophers throughout history have supported monarchy, arguing that it provides stability and unity to society. Others have criticized monarchy, believing it grants too much power to a single ruler and can lead to tyranny. Overall, views on monarchy among philosophers vary depending on their beliefs about political structure and individual rights.
A.Filmer suggested that governments represent the will of the majority, whereas Enlightenment thinkers advocated for minority rights.B.Filmer argued for a strong monarchy, whereas Enlightenment philosophers claimed that government was not necessary because natural law would allow society to advance.C.Enlightenment philosophers advocated government systems that protected the natural rights of man, whereas Filmer argued that people would be lost without the paternal monarch.D.Enlightenment philosophers advocated monarchical governments in which a central king would ensure the rights of the people, whereas Filmer argued for representative democracy.
One fundamental belief of Enlightenment philosophers that influenced democratic revolutions around the world was the idea of popular sovereignty, which asserts that political authority should come from the consent of the governed. This concept challenged the traditional notion of absolute monarchy and laid the groundwork for the establishment of democratic governments based on the will of the people.
No, the spa philosophers were not from Sparta. The spa philosophers were actually ancient Greek philosophers who discussed philosophical ideas while relaxing in the hot springs at places like Athens or Corinth.
Enlightenment philosophers such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau advocated for principles like individual rights, social contract theory, and popular sovereignty. Their ideas challenged traditional notions of monarchy and divine right, inspiring people to question existing political systems and seek greater representation and freedoms. Their writings influenced revolutions like the American Revolution and the French Revolution by promoting the ideas of liberty, equality, and the rights of individuals to govern themselves.
Philosophers have existed throughout human history, with some of the earliest known philosophers dating back to ancient civilizations such as ancient Greece and China. Philosophers continue to exist in contemporary times, engaging in the exploration of fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, ethics, and reality.
Medieval philosophers and scientists typically studied theology, as well. This was considered to be the final authority on all matters.
The names of the philosophers are Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes.
There is no official collective noun for philosophers. A "group" of philosophers is generally the accepted collective noun.
i am as well and i feel the same way bud. me and you both!
he was not very happy about it and decided to make up a new form of government.
No, not philosophers.
The Philosophers' Magazine was created in 1997.
Philosophers' Imprint was created in 2001.
The Worldly Philosophers was created in 1953.
The Military Philosophers was created in 1968.
One fundamental belief of Enlightenment philosophers that influenced democratic revolutions around the world was the idea of popular sovereignty, which asserts that political authority should come from the consent of the governed. This concept challenged the traditional notion of absolute monarchy and laid the groundwork for the establishment of democratic governments based on the will of the people.
A.Filmer suggested that governments represent the will of the majority, whereas Enlightenment thinkers advocated for minority rights.B.Filmer argued for a strong monarchy, whereas Enlightenment philosophers claimed that government was not necessary because natural law would allow society to advance.C.Enlightenment philosophers advocated government systems that protected the natural rights of man, whereas Filmer argued that people would be lost without the paternal monarch.D.Enlightenment philosophers advocated monarchical governments in which a central king would ensure the rights of the people, whereas Filmer argued for representative democracy.