it ruled infavor of segregation as long as facilities were equal
Plessy v Ferguson made the fight against segregation more difficult by establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for the legal segregation of public facilities based on race. This decision legitimized and perpetuated racial segregation, undermining efforts to challenge discriminatory practices and maintain racial inequality for decades to come.
Segregation
Yes- Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the constitutionality of the "seperate but equal" (or segregation) clause.
Segregation
Plessy v Ferguson upheld the constitutionality of the "seperate but equal clause" and segregation. 7-1
Plessy v Ferguson upheld the constitutionality of the "seperate but equal clause" and segregation. 7-1
Segregation
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)No. Plessy v. Ferguson was a US Supreme Court case that legally sanctioned racial segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
He was the person in the case of plessy v.s Ferguson .And Ferguson won
In the Plessy versus Ferguson case it was decided that the state law of racial segregation concerning public facilities, like trains, was protected under the constitution.
Plessy v Ferguson, a Supreme Court case in 1896, established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for racial segregation in public facilities as long as they were equal in quality. This decision strengthened segregation laws and made it more difficult to challenge them legally. It provided a legal basis for continuing racial discrimination and limited the ability of those fighting against segregation to argue that it violated the rights of African Americans.
The Supreme Court ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson is what provided constitutional justification for segregation. Segregation in public schools was outlawed in another Supreme Court ruling in 1954.